Showing posts with label MDG-s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MDG-s. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Helen Clark leading the UN's new leftist - "post 2015" agenda

Click here for this in full @ : http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/presscenter/articles/2013/02/27/post-2015-goals-must-suit-new-contexts-undp-chief-says-helen-clark-calls-for-reinvigorated-transformational-agenda-.html

27 February 2013


Helen Clark calls for ‘reinvigorated, transformational’ agenda


Bogota — New global development goals must reflect current realities while sustaining the vision and momentum of the original Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), UN Development Programme (UNDP) Administrator Helen Clark said Wednesday.

“The food, fuel, climate, economic, political, and security crises of the first 12 years of this century have reminded us of how fragile development gains can be in the face of shock and adversity,” she said in opening remarks here to a global conference on “Making the MDGs Work.”

The conference, hosted by the Government of Colombia, comes just over 1,000 days before the 31 Dec. 2015 target set by the 2000 Millennium Declaration, in which 189 national delegations pledged to work toward eight goals such as reducing child and maternal mortality, expanding access to clean water and sanitation, and tackling acute hunger.

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Countries map plan to accelerate the MDGs

 


 Click here for this in full @ Pacific One: http://www.pacific.one.un.org/index.php?option=com_news&Itemid=45&task=view&id=367

25 October 2012 (Suva, Fiji) – As the three-day Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Acceleration Framework Pacific Methodological Workshop came to an end yesterday, participants were reminded there is much more work to be done. 


Participants from Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu identified and reviewed the methodological steps of the MDG Acceleration Framework. They prioritized ongoing interventions, identified and categorized bottlenecks, and developed and prioritized solutions to achieve some of the MDGs. The MDGs Acceleration Framework is a new process to the Pacific and participating countries are at various stages of formulation. Fiji participated in the workshop as an observer. 
 
Tonga chose to combat non-communicable diseases (NCDs - MDG target 6.C), Tuvalu looked at improving primary school completion rates (MDG target 2.A) and Vanuatu identified improving access to reproductive health focusing on adolescent birth rates and unmet need for family planning (MDG target 5.B).   
 
Speaking at the closing of the workshop, Ms Akiko Fujii, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Deputy Resident Representative reminded participants that the “formulation process does not end here as the deliberations from this workshop will be taken back to be reviewed by established expert working groups and a final validation workshop will be undertaken before the Framework is endorsed. Following the endorsement, will be the application of the MDGs Acceleration Framework within existing local planning and implementation mechanisms with support from relevant development partners.”  
“The sharing of experiences among the four countries has enriched the MDGs Acceleration Framework formulation process in each of individual countries,” Ms Fujii said. 
 
“It is encouraging to note that the draft MDGs Acceleration Framework action plans have taken into account disparities and inequalities within countries that is the rural and urban divide, gender dimensions and the needs of vulnerable groups,” Ms Fujii added. 
 
The MDGs Acceleration Framework is an innovative approach designed to help countries identify and resolve barriers to eradicating extreme poverty and achieving sustainable development. It provides a systematic way for countries to develop their own action plan based on existing plans and processes to pursue their MDGs priorities. It also helps governments to focus on disparities and inequalities, two of the major causes of uneven progress, by particularly responding to the needs of the vulnerable.
 
[Ends]
For more information contact, Sheryl Ho, UNDP Knowledge Communications Analyst, tel: (679) 3227-504 or email: sheryl.ho@undp.org.

    ###  ###  ###

UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. With offices in more than 160 countries and territories, we offer global perspective and local insight to help empower lives and build resilient nations.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

UNDP's turning into "Walls Street" ? All staffers excited about trading in carbon certificates...following the money$$ leads to Paribas BNP Fortis Bank !



UNDP/MDG Carbon Facility

General Information

The MDG Carbon Facility is a UNDP initiative to leverage the considerable resources of the carbon markets to finance in-country sustainable development projects. UNDP anticipates developing a pipeline of approximately 36 Projects in order to generate the 15 million credit volume. The final number of Projects may vary, depending on their actual size.

Projects have not yet been selected, but rather will be identified on an ongoing basis over the two year project sourcing phase. For illustrative purposes, a typical project may have the following characteristics: The project may belong to a private sector entity, for example a private utility, or a public sector entity, for example a municipality.

The entity which has ownership to the Project’s credits is given the term project proponent (the “Project Proponent”); projects may utilize a broad variety of technologies. Example technologies include renewable energies, energy efficiency, capture of methane, etc; projects may contribute directly to the MDGs, for instance through employment or health benefits, or indirectly through associated programs, where carbon finance proceeds are reinvested into the MDGs; projects result in significant investment flows into the country.

Implementation Period:

  • From: 01 June 2008
  • To: 01 June 2011

Participating Entity(-ies):

  • UN Development Programme (UNDP)

Non-UN Partner(s):

  • Fortis Bank

Region(s) Covered:

  • Global/World

Website(s):

Focus Area(s):

  • Mitigation
  • Financing
  • Capacity Building

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Korea-UNDP Trust Fund for the poor - saving the world? No one knows how the funds are spent, no accountability, transparency or even independent auditing of Korea's funds to UNDP since 2009.


Click here for this story in full @ Korea Herald: http://view.koreaherald.com/kh/view.php?ud=20121010000988&cpv=0

After more than a year of fruitless job hunting, Dawin Perez no longer worries where his family’s next meal will come from.

With help from the Korean government and the United Nations Development Programme, Perez took part in a month-long training session at Cemprende, a local employment and entrepreneurship support center in his hometown of Cartagena, Colombia.

“I couldn’t find work for a year and a half. Raising a family isn’t easy when there’s no money, but this opportunity was given to me and the program helped me change my life,” Perez said.

“I’ve been trained as a construction supervisor and I’m now working as a warehouse assistant in an important enterprise.”

The project is one of eight worldwide that have been commissioned under a joint Korea-UNDP Trust Fund launched in 2009 with $10 million. Programs are designed to help some of the world’s poorest countries cut poverty, tackle climate change and work to meet the U.N. Millennium Development Goals.

Click here for this story in full @ Korea Herald: http://view.koreaherald.com/kh/view.php?ud=20121010000988&cpv=0

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Olav Kjørven says that "stakes are high for UN panel replacing MDGs" - but doesn't explain why were MDGs expired and what did they achieved so far?

Read full article on The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2012/sep/25/replacing-millennium-development-goals?newsfeed=true

Stakes are high for UN panel replacing millennium development goals

The UN panel starting work on a post-2015 development vision faces huge pressure to cover issues left out of the original goals, to decide who to consult and how to set measurable targets
MDG : High Level panel post Millennium Development Goals : washing clothes in Niger River, Mali
Residents washing clothes on the banks of the Niger River, in central Mali. Their future, along with millions of others, is the focus of UN discussions to replace the MDGs. Photograph: Francois Xavier Marit/AFP/Getty Images
 
For the past 12 years, the millennium development goals (MDGs) have shaped policy, guided political agendas, and channelled hundreds of millions of dollars of aid money around the globe. But with the MDGs due to expire at the end of 2015, the international community is starting to tackle the huge, inevitable follow-up question: what comes next?

The post-MDG process will officially begin on Tuesday, when a UN-appointed committee of international political big-shots will meet for the first time in New York. Led by the UK prime minister David Cameron, Liberia's President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, and Indonesia's President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, the 26-member committee has been assigned the task of creating a "development vision" to replace the MDGs after they expire.

"The stakes are very, very high," says Ben Leo, global policy director of the anti-poverty organisation, One Campaign. "Not just in terms of money, but also how much time and energy is going to be spent on monitoring and implementing these goals – and creating additional political momentum over the next 10 to 15 years."...

Read full article on The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2012/sep/25/replacing-millennium-development-goals?newsfeed=true

Friday, March 2, 2012

UNDP SPANISH TRUST FUND SCANDAL: Spanish Accounts Tribunal to investigate the United Nations and IDB on Rebeca Grynspan's personal advisors affairs

ANOTHER UNDP CORRUPTION SCANDAL
FOR
HELEN CLARK


El Tribunal de Cuentas fiscalizará la gestión irregular del PSOE en un fondo de cooperación

Una denuncia alerta sobre posibles ilegalidades en la gestión de 50 millonesEl Ministerio de Economía nególas acusaciones delos trabajadores



ÁNGEL DE ANTONIO
Elena Salgado, exvicepresidenta del Gobierno


El Tribunal de Cuentas ha decidido finalmente investigar la gestión que el Gobierno socialista, a través del Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda, ha venido haciendo del Fondo General de Cooperación de España, dotado con 50 millones de euros, que se ha destinado al Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID), con sede en Washington. La decisión de fiscalizar este fondo se adoptó en la reunión del Pleno de este tribunal, celebrada el pasado 26 de enero, y así consta en el programa de fiscalización, al que ha tenido acceso ABC.

En este programa, aprobado en dicha reunión y elevado a la Comisión Mixta Congreso-Senado para las Relaciones con el Tribunal de Cuentas, se recoge la decisión de fiscalizar «por iniciativa» de este organismo «las inversiones financieras permanentes en el exterior y organismos internacionales, gestionadas por la Dirección General de Análisis Macroeconómico y Economía Internacional del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (antes Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda)». El Tribunal de Cuentas especifica que su investigación se centrará fundamentalmente, en aquellas «correspondientes al Fondo General de Cooperación de España en el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID)».

Falta de ética

El origen de esta decisión del Tribunal de Cuentas está en la denuncia que presentaron un grupo de trabajadores españoles del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, alertando sobre una serie de ilegalidades. Un informe, que adelantó ABC en su edición del pasado 2 de octubre de 2011, y que detalla hasta cuatro tipos de irregularidades.

La primera de ellas afectaría a la funcionaria internacional del BID, Carmen Albertos, que gestiona este fondo, siendo miembro de la Comisión Ejecutiva de la Agrupación del PSOE de Washington. Los denunciantes aseguran que se está incumpliendo el Código Ético del BID que afirma que «los empleados no podrán participar en actividades políticas o partidistas que impliquen la candidatura, aceptación o nombramiento a un cargo público o político», debiendo renunciar a su cargo en el Banco.

La segunda irregularidad se refiere a la delegación de autoridad que el Ministerio hizo a favor de Carmen Albertos para «la aprobación de cooperaciones técnicas por importe de hasta cien mil euros cada una de ellas». En este sentido, advierten que «esta delegación de autoridad se concedió a favor de una persona que no es autoridad pública española ni funcionaria de la Administración General del Estado, sino que es funcionaria internacional del BID».

A Carmen Albertos le imputan estos trabajadores haber aprobado cuatro cooperaciones técnicas, entre 2007 y 2009, por una suma total de 380.564 euros, teniendo como beneficiario directo a Juan José Llisteri, funcionario internacional del BID y «también miembro de la Ejecutiva de la Agrupación del PSOE de Washington. Es decir, colega de Carmen Alberto por partida doble». Tres de estas cooperaciones fueron aprobadas por la Dirección General de Financiación Internacional del Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda (MEH), «lo cual demuestra que el MEH ampara los conflictos de interés dentro del BID en aras de intereses partidistas».

La cuarta cooperación técnica, «en beneficio de su colega en el PSOE de Washington, fue aprobada directamente por Carmen Albertos en junio de 2009, en virtud de la autoridad que le concedió el Ministerio».

La tercera irregularidad que plantean es «la ausencia de fiscalización del Ministerio de Economía» a estos fondos y, finalmente, denuncian «la falta de control del Ministerio, que no evalúa ni el impacto ni la eficacia de los proyectos de cooperación, tal y como reflejan los informes anuales de 2008 y 2009».

Otras subvenciones

El Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda, entonces dirigido por Elena Salgado, negó en una nota enviada a ABC las denuncias de los trabajadores, pero estos sostienen sus acusaciones y han seguido adelante hasta que el Tribunal de Cuentas ha decidido abrir la investigación.

Además de fiscalizar este fondo concreto que se destina al Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, el Tribunal de Cuentas también ha decidido fiscalizar las cuotas a organismos internacionales y «las subvenciones y ayudas otorgadas con cargo a los créditos del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación en los ejercicios 2008 y 2009.

Las irregularidades que han denunciado los trabajadores españoles en el BID también ha sido puestas en conocimiento del presidente de este organismo internacional, Luis Alberto Moreno. Así consta en la carta que le ha enviado Beatrice Edwards, directora ejecutiva de Government Accountability Project (GAP), una organización sin ánimo de lucro que defiende la libertad de expresión, y a la que ha tenido acceso en ABC. En la misma, alerta sobre la debilidad de los «controles internos» de este fondo y del «conflicto de intereses» que se produce en la gestión de Carmen Albertos.

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS ON ABC.ES

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE SCANDAL STORY ON FOXNEWS

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

The Guardian: - Who is going to pay for the MDGs?

CLICK HERE FOR FULL ARTICLE ON GUARDIAN.CO.UK

Aid alone is not enough, but transparency and accountability are essential
if tax revenues are to be used to plug the financing gap


MDG : Taxation to achieve MDG : School children receive food on the waterfront of the Makoko slum
School children receive food in the Makoko slum in Lagos, Nigeria. Photograph: Sunday Alamba/AP

When the millennium development goals (MDGs) were developed, estimates of their cost were used to argue that rich countries should give more aid. The estimates varied – in 2001, the UN suggested that achieving the goals would cost an extra $61bn. In 2002, the World Bank's chief economist for Africa, Shantayanan Devarajan, argued for $63-$72bn. In 2005, the Millennium Project pushed the figure up again, to between $82 and $152bn.

Yet economists recognised that all these estimates came with serious caveats. Jan Vandemoortele, one of the chief architects of the MDGs, suggested the only correct answer to questions about the cost of the MDGs is "more".

Last month, the OECD Development Centre published a report entitledRevisiting MDG Cost Estimates, in which it estimates that achieving the first six MDGs globally will require $120bn more to be spent every year on health, education and poverty reduction. It also argues that such a price tag is "unaffordable" if it is to be met from aid alone, at a time when donor countries' public finances are in trouble.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

UN/UNDP spend $1.3 Million to run a single PR campaign website for Rio+20. How many poor kids would $1.3 Million save?

How much does UNDP spends on PR campaigns ?

At this moment UN/UNDP/UNEP run 181 Websites which campaign for Rio+20

(make yourself a calculation...)

undpwatch
spends $1.3Mill 2 run this website: - how many poor kids would $1.3Mill save? How much spends on PR?

Mentioned in this Tweet

  • United Nations · Unfollow
    Official twitter account of United Nations. Get the latest information on the UN.


Thursday, February 17, 2011

United Nations Secretary Generals Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change (AGECC) meets in Abu Dhabi


The Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change for United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon met over the weekend to discuss the preparation of its final report that will provide a prioritized set of key practical and action-oriented recommendations. The report will include an implementation plan and suggestions for moving the energy agenda forward in the context of the post-Copenhagen political realities and opportunities.

The high-level Energy and Climate Change Advisory Group held its fourth meeting in Abu Dhabi—directly following the World Future Energy Summit—under the chairmanship of Kandeh K. Yumkella, Director-General of the UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and Chairman of UN-Energy, which is the United Nations system-wide coordinating mechanism on energy issues.

“The Abu Dhabi meeting is essential in the group’s efforts to provide a set of recommendations that will assist the Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in his leadership on climate change and energy issues and the global transition to a sustainable energy future,” said Dr. Yumkella. “With the increasing political prioritization of energy and climate change security, it is imperative that adequate and reliable supplies of energy be addressed in tandem and in the broader context of national development priorities and the Millennium Development Goals”

The Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change is mandated to provide the Secretary General with timely advice on energy issues that are critical to the ongoing climate change discussions.

“The role of the private sector is key in providing the technology and investment flows needed to transform global energy systems,” said Dr. Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, member of the Advisory Group and Chief Executive Officer of Masdar. “It is important that the private sector is fully engaged in the dialogue on a global climate change framework. In order to develop long-term low-carbon strategy that will translate to national policies and action. The Advisory Group is a demonstration of the Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s leadership in developing mutually beneficial partnerships and bringing private sector perspective in relation to issues regarding energy and sustainable development.”

Among those attending the Advisory Group meeting hosted by Masdar, are top executives from companies such as Statoil (Norway), Suntech Holdings (China), Edison International (United States) as well as political figures, including His Excellency Jose Figueres, former President of Costa Rica, Senator Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation, and officials of various UN Agencies and the World Bank.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

UN, world ignore development in Darfur: UN adviser

Reuters Africa

By Alaa Shahine

CAIRO (Reuters) - The U.N. and world powers are not tackling the root causes of the Darfur crisis such as water scarcity water and lack of development, a U.N. adviser said.

"The diplomats and the military strategists and the political strategists want to approach it from a strategic point of view, from a peacekeeping point of view, from a geopolitical point of view ... whatever it is but not from a water and development point of view," Jeffry Sachs said.

Sachs, an adviser to United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said the world body needs to refocus its efforts.

"The right approach is to start from a position that Darfur is one of the most impoverished places on the whole planet. It's one of the most ecologically and economically stressed parts on the whole planet," he told a packed hall at the American University in Cairo on Monday evening.

International experts estimate 200,000 people have died and 2.5 million have been displaced since the conflict flared in 2003 when mostly African rebels revolted against the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum, charging it with neglect.

Darfur is the site of the world's biggest humanitarian operation, with the presence of many aid agencies including the U.N. Most of the work is geared to provide basic aid to millions caught in the conflict rather than long-term development.

Aid agencies came under regular attacks from bandits and combatants as the crisis turned into a free-for-all conflict, with tribes, rebels, bandits and government forces vying for everything from cattle to political power.

Analysts say the eruption of fighting in 2003 was in part the culmination of decades of economic and social neglect by the British occupation and successive Sudanese governments, along with regional conflicts that spilled into the vast, remote area.

WATER RACE

"Nomads from the north of Darfur moved south to find water. What they found was sedentary population and they tried to ethnically cleanse them, so that they can grab the water," Sachs said. "This is a one-sentenced, perhaps dramatically over-simplified (explanation) but it is not wrong".

Sachs, who is also the director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, said he was once summoned to the U.N. for an urgent meeting to discuss the water in Darfur.

He said the meeting turned out to focus only on how to find enough water for 26,000 peacekeepers the world body was preparing to station in the region.

"I said three times during the meeting that's 26,000 people, and there are 7 million people in Darfur, and that probably gives you an idea about the water problem. I could not be heard. The problem was a practical one".

Sachs said cutting wasteful spending on military operations and what he described as excessive corporate bonuses would help the world mobilise enough funds to tackle poverty and ensure comprehensive access to primary healthcare and safe water.

He said the American public still sees power, rather than development and aid, as the best way to settle world problems.

"If we would just look and listen, we'd understand that these are hungry people. And you can send all the armies in the world but you are not going to get one more drop of water that way."

Friday, September 26, 2008

Hefkens tegen het licht





Cindy Schneider       26 september 2008

In de komende week zal het debat plaatsvinden over Herfkens en de onterecht ontvangen toeslag van totaal $280.000,-. In de beleving van mij en een aantal andere mensen kloppen er bepaalde dingen niet.

Samen zijn wij wat dingen uit gaan zoeken en kwamen uit op wel hele vreemde zaken. Zo blijkt de eigenaar van het appartement dat Herfkens huurde niemand minder dan John Deuss te zijn en ligt de huurprijs van andere appartementen in hetzelfde complex vele malen lager. 

Laat ik voorop stellen dat ik van mening ben dat Herfkens al het geld tot de laatste geld terug moet betalen. Wij kunnen geen genoegen nemen met een regeling waar de Nederlandse staat niets mee opschiet. Mocht onze regering het hier toch bij laten stel ik voor dat alle inwoners van Nederland met een belastingschuld wegens te veel ontvangen huurtoeslag een zelfde soort regeling kunnen treffen. Met een zelfde soort regeling bedoel ik werken voor minder dan de helft van het verschuldigde bedrag plus alle onkosten vergoed. 

Nu is het tijd om al mijn bevindingen eens op een rij te zetten. Ik beperk mij alleen tot de zaken die betrekking hebben op Herfkens en waar een bewijs voor is, alle losse flodders kan ik, helaas, niet gebruiken. Ik hoop dat er zaken opgelost kunnen worden en er antwoorden zullen komen op onbeantwoorde vragen. Allereerst zal ik uitleggen hoe ik aan de link Herfkens - Deuss ben gekomen dit schijnt voor sommige mensen iets onduidelijk te zijn en ik heb zelf ook een hekel aan onduidelijkheid! 

Uit een artikel in Vrij Nederland van de hand van Freke Vuijst haalde ik het volgende stuk ; "6. Waarom betaalde het ministerie een huur voor Herfkens’ appartement die zelfs naar New Yorkse maatstaven exorbitant hoog was? Volgens BZ was de huurvergoeding door een externe organisatie vastgesteld. Wat het ministerie niet vermeldt, is dat de huur werd betaald aan een Nederlands bedrijf, Motjan NV, dat volgens het kadaster in New York geregistreerd staat in Curaçao en sinds de bouw van de Dag Hammarskjold Tower, waar Herfkens woonde, eigenaar is van enkele appartementen. Motjans agent is volgens het kadaster gevestigd in Oregon. Meerdere pogingen om in contact te komen met de agent liepen op niets uit." 

Al vrij snel vonden we deze registratie in het Handelsregister van de Kamer van Koophandel en Nijverheid te Curaçao. Daar is op het eerste gezicht niets vreemd mee aan de hand maar wanneer je iets beter kijkt zie je heel duidelijk dat de bestuurder van Motjan N.V. de heer of mevrouw Curaçao Corporation Company N.V. is. Ook van het bedrijf Citco Curaçao N.V. is de eigenaar de heer of mevrouw Curaçao Corporation Company N.V. Wanneer we voor de grap zo maar even de naam van de beruchte bank First Curaçao International Finance Company N.V. (FCIB) intoetsen zien we dat ook van deze bank de Curaçao Corporation Company N.V. de managing director is. Uiteraard wisten we dat de FCIB bank van John Deuss is/was maar dat is bij deze dan ook bevestigd. 

Daar was de link van Motjan N.V. naar John Deuss. Heel makkelijk te vinden, eigenlijk. Diverse mensen vertelden mij dat John Deuss de "Curaçao Corporation Company is", helaas zonder harde bewijzen. Leuk om te weten is dat Curaçao Corporation Company in 2005 een condo op 5th avenue heeft gekocht en contant heeft betaald. De persoon die de overeenkomst ondertekende was Richard van 't Hof, werkzaam voor CITCO. Wat eigenlijk nog veel spraakmakender is, is de connectie van Curaçao Corporation Company en CITCO naar Hugo Chavez. Nederlands belastinggeld naar onzuivere stemmachines? Niet alleen voor Venezuela maar ook voor de VS! 

Voor het appartement in de "Dag Hammarskjold tower" is schijnbaar veel te veel huur betaald. De gemiddelde verhuuurprijs voor een appartement met twee slaapkamers bedraagt $4500.- en nog eentje en zo zijn er nog veel en veel meer. De vraag blijft open wat er werkelijk aan huur is betaald daar het huurcontract ontbreekt. Zonder huurcontract staat eigenlijk alles open. Waar zit Herfkens fout? Ze zit fout omdat ze haar contract niet is nagekomen, een smoesje "ik wist het niet" gaat nooit op wanneer er dingen in een contract staan die je hebt ondertekend. Het pleit niet voor haar dat zij als armoedebestrijdster (nota bene!!) hoge eisen stelde aan vliegreizen en woonruimte. Op loopafstand van de V.N. vanwege kostbare tijd die verloren zou gaan? Zelfs Bloomberg (de burgermeester van New York) reist per metro naar zijn werk.
 
Toch beweert Herfkens dat het niet helemaal haar fout is en als zij in het interview met de Volkskrant de waarheid spreekt dan heeft zij een goed punt. Zo zegt ze dat vele Nederlandse VN medewerkers onterechte huursubsidies hebben ontvangen en dat Buitenlandse zaken haar gebruikt om hun eigen straatje schoon te vegen. Ook maakt ze duidelijk dat zij zelf gekozen zou hebben voor een goedkoper appartement. Van een aantal appartementen bleven er namelijk twee over, de ene was goedkoper maar de delegatie vond die niet representatief genoeg. 

Nu blijven er toch nog wat vragen open. Nog altijd missen wij het huurcontract want het is wel interessant om te weten wie er nu achter zit. Waarom persé dit appartement van Motjan N.V.? Was de delegatie op de hoogte van het verhaal achter de N.V.? Als dat zo is dan is dat uitermate vreemd te noemen, waarom in zee gaan met een vennootschap die connecties heeft met duistere zaken? Indien de delegatie niet op de hoogte was dan is het dus duidelijk dat Buitenlandse zaken het Nederlandse belastinggeld klakkeloos uitgeeft en kan het ministerie wel een onderzoeksteam gebruiken. 

Zoeken naar eigenaren van panden kan via de NY Government. Zoeken op naam of bedrijfsnaam of code, de code is te verkrijgen door het adres in te voeren. Via een oud telefoonboek van Manhattan is Freke Vuijst van Vrij Nederland achter het adres van Eveline Herfkens gekomen. Het ging om 240 E 47th st #27D, Buitenlandse Zaken heeft dit adres bevestigd. Via de vorige link zijn veel gegevens te vinden over personen die optraden namens Motjan N.V. en ook wat de Curaçao Corporation Company heeft gekocht alsmede John Deuss en iedereen die je maar wil vinden in New York. Helaas is er niet direct naar documenten te linken en zijn ze ook niet te downloaden. 

Iedereen die mij kan helpen met tips of iets tegenkomt in dit verhaal dat absoluut niet klopt verzoek ik heel vriendelijk om te reageren. Naar mijn homepage

Friday, September 5, 2008

UNDP Admits Herfkens Broke Rules, Dodges on Currency Exchange Losses

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press

UNITED NATIONS, September 4 -- Poverty was the subject of a September 4 press conference at the UN, featuring Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and UN Development Program Associate Administrator Ad Melkert. Ban left before any questions could be asked. When Inner City Press asked Melkert about the scandal of the UN Millennium Campaign director Eveline Herfkens refusing to return any of the $280,000 she wrongfully took from the Dutch government while ostensibly working only for the UN, Ban's Spokesperson cut in and said that, first, other "substantive questions" would be taken.

While the director of the UN's anti-poverty campaign taking money for luxury housing in violation of UN rules seems substantive, Inner City Press also asked if the UN study being launched took into account aid and barter flows from non-Western countries. Not really, the study's author Robert Vos answered. He said that in the future the UN's Economic and Social Council will better coordinate review of these flows. Video here, from Minute 12:10.

On another issue that UNDP has been delaying answering on, the loss of aid and development funds to government-dictated currency exchange schemes as exposed and admitted in Myanmar, Melkert said would be discussed at the upcoming UNDP Executive Board meeting and, if the Board votes for UNDP to return to North Korea, will be a "point of departure for any further dialogue with North Korea." Video here, from Minute 32:10.


Ban Ki-moon, Rob Vos and Ad Melkert, answers on For-Ex not shown

UNDP left North Korea after a whistleblower who was its operations manager in the country complained of financial irregularities. Recently, the UN Ethics Office recommended that UNDP pay the whistleblower back-salary for having violated his due process rights. Inner City Press asked Melkert if UNDP is going to follow the UN Ethics Office's recommendation. Melkert said, reading from notes, that the individual has initiated a proceeding with the UN's internal justice system and "we are waiting from that outcome to make a decision." Video here, from Minute 31.

Inner City Press asked, so the UN Ethics Office recommendation does not have to be followed, or even considered, until this other process is finished? "No I don't think I said that," Melkert replied, insisting he'd referred to "due UN process." But it is precisely a violation of due process found by the UN Ethics Office that led to the recommendation that back-salary be paid.

It is alleged by sources who've been close to UNDP's North Korea operation that UNDP is moving to reopen the office and program even before the Executive Board considers it. Inner City Press asked UNDP Spokesman Stephane Dujarric about these allegation and Mr. Dujarric replied

"There is absolutely no truth to the reports regarding Mr. Bhatia's presence in the DPRK or other purported UNDP activities in that country. Vineet Bhatia has been in New York since December 2007, and there are no plans for UNDP to return to the DPRK without an explicit green-light from our Executive Board."

There is circulating, however, a print out from UNDP's computer system of UNDP staff apparently already in North Korea. We'll have more on this.

Finally, at the tail-end of the press conference, Melkert purported to respond about Eveline Herfkens, and whether her UNDP-accepted offer to work for one dollar a year -- plus UN Daily Subsistence Allowance of over $300 a day -- makes up for not returning the $280,000 that she wrongfully took. Video here, from Minute 44:53.

While Melkert admitted that the payments "did not comply with UN rules," he called the violations "unwitting" and said that whether she should return the money is between her and the Dutch government. He offered to translate for Inner City Press a letter from the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs, who has said that he didn't think a court case could be won against Ms. Herfkens. Inner City Press asked about a quote

from a Liberal Member of Parliament that "the man in the street who gets too much subsidy has to pay back every cent with interest." Melkert declined to comment on that. The press conference ended with another reporter asking UNDP doesn't have Ms. Herfkens repay the money to the poor. Melker said, "I cannot speak on that." Video here from Minute 47:15.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Kemal Dervis: Business with the Poor is great business


For too long, private businesses have not been seen as key drivers of human development. Yet as the world becomes more interdependent, doing business with the poor can not only boost firms’ competitiveness, but also help in the fight against poverty.

A UNDP report released on Monday offers compelling examples of opportunities that create value for all: both achieving the Millennium Development Goals that have galvanised unprecedented efforts to address the needs of the world’s poorest, and attracting business returns.

Take the case of Celtel, a pan-African telecommunications group. Celtel began offering mobile-banking in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2003, when security in that country was still poor and the banking sector debilitated . Celpay, the service they offer, uses encrypted message technology to allow customers to wire funds across the country.

As a result, Celtel now has over two million subscribers, and has created thousands of jobs and trained local technicians and a sales force throughout the country. The innovative financial service it provides has allowed many formal and informal businesses to grow – businesses that were previously hampered by inadequate banking infrastructure.

While such opportunities for inclusive growth are abundant, so are the challenges. Entering into the markets of the poor is uncharted territory for many companies. It is one where tough obstacles remain, including limited market information, underdeveloped regulatory environments, inadequate physical infrastructure, missing knowledge and skills, and restricted access to financial products and services.

These obstacles often translate into a ‘poverty penalty’ for the poor. People in the slums of Jakarta, Manila and Nairobi can pay up to 5 to 10 times more for water than people in high-income areas of those cities—and more than consumers in London or New York.

This ‘poverty penalty’ is similar in credit, health care and electricity supply. Meeting these challenges in ways that benefit the poor takes creativity, and often requires pooling the skills and experience of private companies, donors, policymakers, philanthropists, public service leaders and nongovernmental organisations. It often involves engaging in a policy dialogue, adapting products and services to the needs of the poor and investing in infrastructure or training.

The report contains 50 specifically commissioned case studies by researchers predominantly from developing countries. These case studies show that by adapting to local conditions, entrepreneurs have successfully identified new opportunities, understood complex contexts, and found innovative solutions.

In Mali, for instance, roughly 64% of the population lives below the national poverty line, and only 10% of the country’s 12 million inhabitants have access to electricity . This number drops to only 2% to 3% in some regions of the country – making economic activity much more challenging. Seeing an opportunity, Électricité de France and its partners set up rural energy services companies .

By the end of 2008, these companies will provide electricity to about 5,000 households in more than 20 villages in the southern cotton region. While they are in partnership with European companies, they are truly independent Malian companies, run by local managers and employees.

Their low-cost electricity, based on solar home systems or small low-voltage village micro-networks supplied by diesel generators, led to new income-generating activities, which have in turn improved the quality of health care and education, increased access to clean water, and reduced CO2 emissions by up to 80% to 90% compared with traditional energy sources.

Work in the area of private sector involvement in less developed markets has so far mainly focused on large multinational firms. Certainly with their influence, global reach and resources, multinationals can effectively scale and replicate successful business models. Yet smaller, local or regional businesses also have much to teach us about strategies that work. They create most of the jobs and wealth required to meet the Millennium Development Goals.

Businesses cannot, however, stand alone. The report suggests that business—accompanied by the skills of governments, donors, civil society and the poor—can build the foundations to grow more inclusive markets.

Governments can unleash the power of business by improving market conditions where poor people live and removing barriers to their economic participation. Notfor-profit organisations, public service providers, microfinance institutions and others already working with the poor can collaborate and pool resources with businesses to help seize opportunities. Donor countries can facilitate dialogues between businesses and governments or other partners.

Socially minded investors and philanthropists can supply the funds to make these time-intensive and uncertain ventures possible. Business models that include the poor require broad support, but they offer gains for all.

With strong and effective political and social institutions , entrepreneurs, firms and households will invest and take risks that promote innovation and create decent jobs. Through the flows of income and creative energy that these jobs generate, people can be lifted out of poverty: their productive capacity can be unleashed, their skills enhanced – providing a solid basis for sustainable development.

The poor are not powerless, nor should they pay a poverty penalty on the products and services that we can so easily take for granted. By recognising them as both potential consumers and drivers of growth, inclusive business models can create greater independence and interdependence – to the benefit of all.

Friday, April 18, 2008

Herfkens weigert terug te betalen

Gepubliceerd: 18 april 2008 10:41 Gewijzigd: 18 april 2008 10:42

Door een onzer redacteuren

Den Haag, 18 april. Oud-minister Evelien Herfkens heeft tot twee keer toe geweigerd de haar ten onrechte door het ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken verstrekte huursubsidie voor een appartement in New York terug te betalen.

Dit heeft minister Verhagen (Buitenlandse Zaken, CDA) gisteravond gezegd in de Tweede Kamer.

Volgens de minister stelt Herfkens dat terugbetaling een schuldigverklaring zou inhouden. Zij staat juist op het standpunt dat ze te goeder trouw heeft gehandeld. Het ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken heeft eerder al erkend dat de subsidie aan Herfkens in strijd is met de regels van de Verenigde Naties waar zij in 2002 aan het werk ging. Maar minister Verhagen ziet vooralsnog geen juridische mogelijkheden de met de huurtoelage gemoeide 280.000 dollar terug te vorderen. Dat kan pas als blijkt dat Herfkens de VN-regels willens en wetens heeft overtreden. Een intern onderzoek van de volkerenorganisatie zal dit moeten uitwijzen.

Herfkens kreeg de subsidie in het kader van een regeling voor Nederlandse diplomaten die naar het buitenland worden uitgezonden. Herfkens was echter niet in dienst van het departement, maar van de UNDP, de ontwikkelingsorganisatie van de VN. Deze organisatie verbiedt expliciet financiële toelages van lidstaten aan hun landgenoten om de onafhankelijkheid te waarborgen.

Een meerderheid van de Tweede Kamer vindt dat Buitenlandse Zaken er alles aan moet doen de ten onrechte verstrekte subsidie terug te krijgen. Het steekt de parlementariërs vooral dat Herfkens, de PvdA politica die in het tweede kabinet Kok minister voor Ontwikkelingssamenwerking was, tot nu toe geen enkel berouw heeft getoond. Ze heeft de ophef over haar vergoeding altijd als overdreven afgedaan. Ter verdediging zei Herfkens onder andere dat zij geen zin had in „een flat met uitzicht op een blinde muur”.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

1.1 Billion escaping both National and International monitoring and accounting

United Nations Development Programme has helped in 2006 alone to create an off-shore haven for almost 1.1 billion dollars thru the so called "national execution" in Latin America.

Here are the facts:

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Eveline Herfkens - Secret Memos


April 1st, 2008 • by Harry van Bommel

In politics agreements are often arrived at and promises made via secret memos. These are informal notes available only to those directly involved. They contain engagements which are not for general consumption. My colleague Ewout Irrgang, the SP's development specialist, recently received a secret memo in which agreements between the former Labour (PvdA) development minister Eveline Herfkens and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs were contained regarding a non-approved rent subsidy which she would receive on top of her huge salary as a special adviser to the UN. This rent subsidy was also enormous, around a quarter of a million.

It is always exceptionally exciting to hold such secret items in your hand. I have, for instance, had in my hand secret agreements of the Dutch Council of Ministers, in which the ministers agreed that they would never give their support to a second referendum on the European Treaty.

This week I once again had a secret memo under my nose. It happened during a debate on next week's NATO summit. Central to it was the question of whether Ukraine and Georgia could become candidate members of NATO. 'No' said, amongst others, Labour, the SP and the Christian Union. In Ukraine a major part of the population is against membership, in Georgia there is serious instability, while in neighbouring Russia NATO's advance eastwards is seen as a dangerous menace. The 'Cold War' lives again, I argued.

Because Christian Democrat (CDA) Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen was not prepared to promise that he would block a decision in favour of candidate membership, I announced that I would be proposing a motion on the matter. Immediately the minister grabbed a pen and wrote a secret memo to Labour spokesman Martijn van Dam who was sitting two places away from me. I was able to read the memo over his shoulder, and I saw that the minister had written something on the use of the veto. He would not be prepared to use it if the Netherlands turned out to be the only opponent of candidate membership. In short, the Netherlands is indeed against this move but will swallow its objections if we are the only ones. Pure opportunism, in other words.

On Tuesday I will propose my motion, nevertheless, to the effect that this candidate membership must be blocked. This will present a curious spectacle. The government is in reality also against, the PvdA is certainly against, but the chance that the motion will gain a majority is small. With his secret memo, Mr Verhagen has put the Labour Party in a difficult position. Will Labour keep its word and continue to oppose the move or will they plump, as usual, for peace within their coalition with the CDA?

Just give me one guess!

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Herfkens: VN-document kan Herfkens geld kosten

dinsdag 1 april 2008 10:15

(Novum) - Een intern stafbulletin van de Verenigde Naties uit 2002 kan oud-minister voor Ontwikkelingssamenwerking Eveline Herfkens (PvdA) geld gaan kosten. In het document, dat aan VN-beambten is gestuurd, staat dat VN-personeel geen geld of vergoedingen mag ontvangen uit andere bronnen dan de VN. Het ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken is in bezit van het bulletin, maar volgens een woordvoerder geeft het geen juridisch uitsluitsel of Herfkens wist dat ze ruim twee ton aan huursubsidie mocht aannemen.

Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Maxime Verhagen (CDA) blijft het standpunt huldigen dat terugvordering pas mogelijk is als nadere informatie van de VN daar aanleiding toe geeft. 'De VN is bezig met een intern onderzoek. Als daaruit blijkt dat Herfkens van de regels wist, dan volgt terugvordering. Ik weet niet of het bulletin aan iedereen bij de VN is verstuurd', zegt de woordvoerder. De resultaten van het onderzoek worden deze maand verwacht.

Vorige week bleek tijdens een Kamerdebat dat het kabinet de ruim tweehonderdduizend euro die Herfkens onterecht ontving toen ze bij het VN-ontwikkelingsprogramma UNDP in New York werkte vooralsnog niet kan terugeisen, omdat dit op juridische problemen stuit. Verhagen zei dat niet meer is vast te stellen of Herfkens zelf om de huursubsidie heeft gevraagd of dat het ministerie die haar heeft aangeboden. Eerst moet worden bewezen dat Herfkens wist dat ze de subsidie niet mocht aannemen.

Herfkens heeft eerder gezegd dat zij de huursubsidie nodig had omdat ze in een appartement van minstens honderd vierkante meter op loopafstand van het VN-kantoor wilde wonen.