UNDP WATCH: JOIN US IN FACEBOOK: United Against Corruption and Mismanagement at United Nations

Thursday, August 13, 2009

JOIN US IN FACEBOOK: United Against Corruption and Mismanagement at United Nations

All of those who believe in United Nations should join us in our FACEBOOK GROUP:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=56375287768

Invite all your friends, and let call for Helen Clark to stop the corruption, nepotism and mismanagement inside the United Nations Development Programme.

Thank you all,

2 comments:

External said...: Interesting piece from UNFORUM:
http://www.unforum.com/UNheadlines583.htm

The main question is: why does Secretary General Ban keep these people?

One answer often given is that they have backing in some influential capitals and that, as such, they will be able to help him gain support for a renewed second term.

That, however, is a very optimistic belief. Experience has shown that dinosaurs are more likely to dump their load and shift once they feel the winds of change.; Thursday, August 13, 2009
Anonymous said...: I suspect that Helen Clark is incapable of removing corruption, nepotism and mismanagement inside the United Nations Development Programme after all she has lead the most corrupt government in New Zealands history.; Monday, August 17, 2009

Post a Comment

Andrew Mitchell - says Helen Clark is up to no good!

1. UNDP’s partnership with the World Bank needs to be more effective, particularly in fragile and crisis-affected countries. 2. UNDP’s near universal mandate means its technical resources are spread very thinly. The Board does not provide strategic direction. HR management is weak. It has a weak results chain. 3. There is limited evidence of active senior management consideration of cost control. Country evidence points to mixed progress on demonstrating cost-efficiency. 4. The Executive Board is politicised and there is a lack of consensus on the key areas for reform. It is not clear that current plans for change will deliver the required depth and breadth of reform. 5. Evidence gathered at country level was highly critical of UNDP’s ability to deliver results. Its delivery can be undermined by staffing issues and bureaucratic processes. 6. Its performance in fragile states is mixed. It has reasonable training and a range of guidance and analytical tools but struggles to fill posts. 7. There is no evidence that the Climate Strategy was directly guiding resource allocation decisions

H.E. Dirk Niebel - German Development Minister

"I take the accusations made in the media concerning corruption and breach of fiduciary duty at the Global Fund very seriously and I am sure that the Fund will clarify the matter without delay. Germany is one of the biggest donors to the Global Fund. I have therefore seen to it that a special review will be held. I have frozen all further disbursements to the Fund until matters have been fully clarified, and I will ask a representative of the Fund to come to the BMZ to discuss the matter."

Share now information about illegal dealings at United Nations

Ban Ki Moon supports Ethics Decision on UNDP North Korea