Showing posts with label ahlenius. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ahlenius. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

UN's internal watchdog faces leadership vacuum

UNITED NATIONS — The leader of the agency that is supposed to root out corruption in the United Nations is stepping down Wednesday with no successor in sight, adding to fears that the U.N. is becoming less capable of policing itself.

With the departure of Inga-Britt Ahlenius, head of the Office of Internal Oversight Services for the past five years, three of the agency's four top jobs are unfilled. American and U.N. officials and watchdog groups are concerned that the U.N. is compromising its ability to prevent another scandal like the $1.8 billion bilked from the U.N.-run oil-for-food program in Iraq.

"The United States has consistently and aggressively pushed for a strong and independent Office of Internal Oversight Services to uncover fraud, waste and mismanagement at the U.N., but we are disappointed with the recent performance of its investigations division," said Patrick Ventrell, a spokesman for the U.S. Mission to the U.N.

"We have been crystal clear with the U.N. at the highest levels that the coming change in OIOS leadership must bring about a significant improvement in its performance to increase oversight and transparency throughout the organization," he told the AP, using the initials of the oversight office.

Interviews with OIOS officials and documents uncovered in Associated Press investigations portray a demoralized office whose staff lacks confidence in the management's leadership.

Despite a General Assembly resolution last December urging Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to ensure that a successor was appointed before Ahlenius' term expired, none has been named and no indication has been given of when that will happen.

Asked by AP about the prospects for replacing Ahlenius, Angela Kane, the U.N.'s undersecretary-general for management, said July 1 that "a very intensive search" is under way.

Ahlenius declined interview requests and said by e-mail she will submit her end-of-assignment report to Ban on Wednesday, her last day on the job.

Another OIOS leadership position — the directorship of its investigative division — has been vacant since 2006. That unit's investigators were told, in a document obtained by the AP, not to open cases of financial fraud or corruption involving U.N. vendors or former staff — a reversal of past policy. Separately, they were ordered not to follow up on or to quickly close out investigations already launched by the U.N. Procurement Task Force when it operated from 2006 through 2008, according to OIOS officials speaking on condition of anonymity because they said they feared reprisals.

The Procurement Task Force, set up in the wake of the oil-for-food case, was headed by Robert Appleton, a veteran former U.S. federal prosecutor who was special counsel for that inquiry. It was disbanded at the end of 2008 under pressure from some governments that protested findings of wrongdoing involving citizens or companies from their nations.

The General Assembly had directed Ban and Ahlenius to ensure that the task force's caseload and capacities were transferred to OIOS' investigation division.

But since the start of 2009, the U.N. under Ban has cut back sharply on investigations into corruption and fraud within its ranks, shelving cases involving allegations of theft or misuse of millions of dollars, an AP investigation in January showed.

Many of the Procurement Task Force's completed investigations included urgent recommendations to turn over evidence to prosecutors in the countries concerned, but Ban's office rarely did so. The U.N. has no prosecutorial powers.

Since the start of 2009, Ban's office has referred one major case outside the U.N., according to U.N. officials, diplomats and figures supplied to AP by the U.N.'s legal office. Some major reports also remain sealed from public view, for no publicly stated reasons.

Last month, when asked by the AP to respond to the allegations and detail the U.N.'s anti-corruption efforts, Ban replied only that "addressing corruption as a way of enhancing good governance — that is a very important area — the United Nations is putting emphasis on that."

However, David Walker, the former U.S. comptroller general who now chairs the U.N.'s Independent Audit Advisory Committee, told AP he fears OIOS will be relegated to "a caretaker status" under the temporary oversight of the U.N.'s legal chief, Patricia O'Brien.

"Frankly, my bigger concern now is the leadership vacuum that exists in OIOS because Ahlenius' term ends this month, and it's very unclear what the status of the search is for a successor," said Walker, whose committee advises the General Assembly on accountability issues.

"And, furthermore, the heads for the investigation division and the evaluation and inspections division are still open," Walker said. "There are recommendations that have been pending with the secretary-general's office for an extended period of time — and just no response whatsoever."

Appleton was twice unanimously selected by an independent U.N. panel to head the investigations unit, and was among the more than 70 applicants who responded to worldwide advertising for a candidate. He was Ahlenius' choice for the job, but when asked why he hasn't gotten the job, Ban's office and Kane said the list of applicants lacked diversity.

In the absence of a permanent director, the investigation division is run by an acting director, Michael Dudley, a career U.N. official. The department's management under his tenure was criticized by some employees of the 70-strong division in a survey of staff in late 2008 obtained by AP.

Of 52 respondents, 47 percent said the management operates with integrity and 41 percent said it doesn't. The rest had no opinion. About three-fifths described the office as having low morale, ineffective leadership and unfair promotion practices.

In a Nov. 24, 2008, e-mail to senior staff, Dudley said the survey contained "some expected comments, some of which are very personal and related to my integrity and performance." He noted "most of the negative comments about me show a lack of trust," but said he hoped to change that.

The Government Accountability Project, a Washington-based nonprofit law firm, has previously represented at least one OIOS investigator who filed a whistleblower complaint alleging retaliation by Dudley.

Bea Edwards, the firm's international program director, told the AP that Dudley "does not seem to have been able to really pursue and close the tough cases that were left there by the Procurement Task Force."

"Many serious cases of substantial corruption have simply been closed or languished in that division under his management," she said.

The AP's investigation, based on U.N. documents and interviews with officials, found that Dudley has a record of closing cases before investigations were complete and has not actively pursued the initiatives begun by the Procurement Task Force. These include plans to investigate all five of the U.N.'s economic commissions around the world.

He also has cut back on investigators experienced in financial fraud and corruption and ditched other resources including former task force investigators and a task force contract that provided expert forensic support services.

Dudley, a 47-year-old Kentuckian, was hired as a deputy director of the investigative division in 2007. He declined to be interviewed, but in response to detailed questions, he told AP by e-mail he considers every investigation to be significant. He said his division looks into allegations of fraud, bribery and embezzlement and "a wide range of matters beyond."

Friday, January 23, 2009

PROFIT MAFIA IN UNDP


According to U.N. Chief Procurement Officer Akiko Yuge, the contract for PRO-FIT was approved after a "competitive bidding process" in 1998. The contract was approved under an arrangement known as a Reimbursable Loan Agreement, which allows UNDP to pay outside companies for the services of temporary employees, and does not, Yuge says, require further competitive bidding. "UNDP believes that to date it has received value for money from PRO-FIT," she added.


That is a stunning statement from a Chief Procurement Officer, a red herring, no doubt.


RLAs are rarely used, and if so, only to obtain the very specific services/expertise of an individual or a small group (say, a research institution).


The agreement will typically be for a limited period of time (some months, maybe a year).


RLAs are not intended for temp agency services.


Yuge is lying (what's new). A contract for temp services should always be awarded competitively. If this agency has had an ongoing contract for 10 years (or even more) simply for temp services of clerical nature (data entry they claim...) it is a sweetheart deal of the worst kind.


For one, temp services should by nature not end up as a 10 year + contract - that is self-contradictory.


The constant use of temps also constrict career opportunity and development for regular staff, and is in some cases used as intimidation ('If you guys don't behave and do my bidding, we'll outsource what you do!')UNDP needs major house cleaning. Problem is that top management is the big problem.


The Executive Board must step up before this spins further out of control.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

United Nations: Management Reforms and Operational Issues

GAO-08-246T January 24, 2008
Highlights Page (PDF) Full Report (PDF, 18 Pages) Accessible Text (HTML)

-------------------------------------------------------

Longstanding problems in United Nations (UN) management underscore the pressing need to reform and modernize the United Nations in areas ranging from management, oversight, and accountability to operational activities in specific countries. The United States has strongly advocated the reform of UN management practices and has also been critical of the restrictions Burma's military regime has imposed on many international organizations in Burma over the past 3 years. This testimony, based on recent GAO reports, discusses (1) management reform efforts at the UN Secretariat since 2006; (2) oversight and accountability in selected UN organizations; and (3) UN and other international organizations' activities in Burma.

GAO's report on UN management reform efforts notes that (1) progress has varied in the five areas GAO examined--ethics, oversight, procurement, management operations of the Secretariat, and review of programs and activities (mandates)--and (2) various factors, such as disagreements among member states, have slowed the pace of progress. The UN ethics office has taken steps to improve organizational ethics, including implementing a whistleblower protection policy, but GAO identified issues that may limit the impact of the policy. The UN has taken steps to improve oversight, including establishing an Independent Audit Advisory Committee. However, UN funding arrangements continue to constrain the independence of the Secretariat's internal audit office and its ability to audit high-risk areas. The UN has taken steps to improve certain procurement practices, but has not implemented an independent bid protest system or approved a lead agency concept, which could improve procurement services. The UN has taken steps to improve certain management operations of the Secretariat, but has made little or no progress in others. Despite some limited initial actions, the UN's review of mandates has not advanced, due in part to a lack of support by many member states. Finally, the pace of UN management reforms has been slowed by member states' disagreements on reform efforts, lack of comprehensive implementation plans, administrative issues that complicate certain internal processes, and competing UN priorities. GAO's report on oversight and accountability of selected UN organizations notes that, although the six UN internal audit offices GAO reviewed have made progress in implementing international auditing standards, they have not fully implemented key components of the standards. None of these six organizations require their internal oversight staff to disclose their financial interests. However, GAO found that five of the six organizations have made efforts to increase accountability by establishing whistleblower protection policies and one was developing such a policy. GAO also reported that while the six UN evaluation offices GAO reviewed are working toward implementation of UN evaluation standards, they have not fully implemented them. Finally, GAO reported that the governing bodies responsible for oversight of the six organizations lack full access to internal audit reports. GAO's report on Burma notes that Burma's military regime has blocked or significantly impeded UN and other international organizations' efforts to address human rights concerns and to help people living in areas affected by ethnic conflict. The regime frustrated international organizations' efforts to monitor forced labor for years before signing an agreement in early 2007; restricted their efforts to assist populations living in conflict areas; and blocked their efforts to monitor prison conditions and conflict situations. The regime has, to a lesser degree, impeded UN food, development, and health programs. However, several UN and other international organization officials told GAO they are still able to achieve meaningful results in their efforts to mitigate some of Burma's humanitarian, health, and development problems.


Subject Terms
Program management
Program evaluation
Procurement practices
Policy evaluation
International relations
International organizations
International food programs
International cooperation
International agreements
Internal audits
Burma
Foreign aid programs
Auditing standards
Accountability
United Nations Oil for Food Program

UN report finds 43% of procurement is tainted by fraud

United Nations LogoAccording to a leaked report from internal United Nations auditors, 43% of UN procurement investigated is tainted by fraud. Out of $1.4 billion in UN contracts internally investigated, $610 million was tainted by ten “significant fraud and corruption schemes."

Since 43% of the procurement contracts are tainted and the U.S. taxpayer contributes up to 25% of all UN funding, it is safe to say the entire U.S. contribution in this case has been lost to corruption and waste.

Key Facts:

8 UN procurement officials have been suspended,

4 have been charged with management deficiencies or breach of U.N. rules, and

3 have been found guilty of bribery and related crimes by U.S. federal courts.

Further Readings:

UN Procurement Task Force Report (108.9 KBs)
Oct 5, 2007

Friday, March 28, 2008

Herfken's Secret Memo shows she personally negotiated her house subsidy in 2002

Well ......now everyone knows that Eveline Herfkens belongs to jail. She personally negotiated with the Minsitry of Foreign Affairs her rental subsidy and other details of her tenure at UNDP as ASG for MDGs.

Kemal Dervis = lied about Herfkens;
Ad Melkert = lied about Herfkens;
David Morrison = lied about Herfkens;

and finally

Ban Ki-moon = lied about Herfkens;

UNDP Watch is publishing the letter in original (click here for pdf version)


For how long can these UN managers think that they will go unpunished?