Showing posts with label sri lanka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sri lanka. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

BBC Exclusive: - UN 'failed Sri Lanka civilians', says internal probe


Click here to read the full story on BBC NEWS: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20308610


Displaced Sri Lankans in the Vanni area as a result of fighting between government forces and the LTTE  
Hundreds of thousands of Tamils ended up trapped in a tiny strip of land

Related Stories

The United Nations failed in its mandate to protect civilians in the last months of Sri Lanka's bloody civil war, a leaked draft of a highly critical internal UN report says.
"Events in Sri Lanka mark a grave failure of the UN," it concludes.
The government and Tamil rebels are accused of war crimes in the brutal conflict which ended in May 2009.
The UN's former humanitarian chief, John Holmes, has criticised the report.

Click here to read the full story on BBC NEWS: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20308610

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Australian Taxpayers $$ go to Sri Lankan forests thru UNDP Carbon Certificate programme

Click here to read this story @ Colombo Page: http://www.colombopage.com/archive_12A/Oct13_1350109964CH.php


Oct13, Colombo: The Sri Lankan government together with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Australian government has launched a community forestry program.

The program launched Wednesday (October 11) with AUD 5 million (over 650 million rupees) assistance from Australia aims to increase forest cover and support small farmers living in Sri Lanka's dry zone.

According to the UNDP, Sri Lanka has lost half of its forest cover during the past hundred years and deforestation and forest degradation which result in lack of water for farming and drinking is a source of poverty for rural households.

Also the dwindling forest cover increases the risk of drought and forest fires as Sri Lanka recently experienced.

Large number of poor farmer communities use forest resources to survive, the UNDP points out.
Under the government's Mahinda Chintana Future Vision, Sri Lanka plans to double the forest cover in 10 years.

Click here to read this story @ Colombo Page: http://www.colombopage.com/archive_12A/Oct13_1350109964CH.php

Sunday, September 23, 2012

United Nations gives millions to Sri Lanka to develop 10,000 hectares of bamboo cultivation and produce electricity from it

Read full story on SundayTimes.lk : http://www.sundaytimes.lk/120923/business-times/bamboo-resumes-its-ancient-glory-under-major-production-drive-12906.html

View(s):

In another seven years – by 2019 – Sri Lanka would come under 10,000 hectares of bamboo cultivation with 150,000 tons of dry bamboo harvested annually. This would provide, among other major economic benefits, 113 megawatts of electricity to the national grid which would then account for 2.7 per cent of the total electricity generated in the country.

Seen here the Minister exchanges greetings with some donor agency officials. Pic by Mangala Weerasekera.

The project ‘Bamboo Processing for Sri Lanka’ initiated by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), its Sri Lanka Chapter, and the National Operational Focal Point for Global Environmental Facility (GEF), Ministry of Environment was launched this week in Colombo and set to cost US$24 million. It has taken two years to study the viability of the project in Sri Lanka and to lay the groundwork in place.

Dr Kentaro Aoki, Associate Expert, UNIDO speaking of the divergent economic benefits of the project said that once the entire 10,000 hectares are matured, the harvest connected to various industries envisage a huge income generation for the country and the creation of at least 80,000 jobs. It is aimed to reduce poverty levels in rural areas. He said the bamboo project would create new business opportunities, increase the use of non-imported local products; avoid deforestation; reduce greenhouse gas emissions through bamboo plantation and products; reduce degraded lands and prevent soil erosion. The propagation of bamboo cultivation would increasingly add to the reforestation. It would also fill in old abandoned tea plantations. He said that bamboo comes under the species of grass and it brings in several environmental benefits and production of high quality crafts, furniture and other implements could be produced out of bamboo, and there is a great export potential. It would achieve a dual purpose of high economic as well as enormous environmental benefits.

Read full story on SundayTimes.lk : http://www.sundaytimes.lk/120923/business-times/bamboo-resumes-its-ancient-glory-under-major-production-drive-12906.html

Monday, February 20, 2012

InnerCityPress Exclusive: On Silva, Ambassadors Meet With UN Peacekeeping, Rice Says Concerned, Immunity Letter from USUN Surfaces

By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive

@InnerCityPress

UNITED NATIONS, February 17, updated -- Three weeks ago Inner City Press began asking the UN and then the US Mission to the UN how they could accept as a UN "Senior Adviser on Peacekeeping Operations" General Shavendra Silva, whose Division 58 is repeatedly named in connection with war crimes in Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's Panel of Experts report on Sri Lanka.

On February 14, Bangledesh's Permanent Representative told Inner City Press he, India and Pakistan were telling Sri Lanka to "fix it."

On February 16, Pakistan's Permanent Representative confirmed this and said there was a meeting on February 17 on the topic. That meeting, of ambassadors with the two Under Secretaries General for peacekeeping, Inner City Press understands, took place Friday at 9:45 am.

At 10:30 am Friday, Inner City Press asked US Ambassador Susan Rice about a letter it found that that Russell F. Graham, Minister Counselor for Host Country Affairs at the US Mission to the UN, provided to Silva's lawyers to tell a US Federal Court that Silva, as Sri Lanka's Deputy Permanent Representative, has diplomatic immunity. On that basis, this case against Silva was dismissed.

Inner City Press is putting the letter online, here.

Ambassador Rice took the question, some from Inner City Press on Sudan, and said, "These are two different things. The State Department has to respond on immunity. He unfortunately or fortunately is an accredited diplomat."

Then, more generally on Silva, Rice told Inner City Press, "it's very concerning that someone with his background would be selected to serve on this advisory group. We have conveyed this to member states, as well as to the Secretariat. There are a lot of efforts underway to address [this], probably best not to be discussed publicly."

Moments later, another Security Council Permanent Representative approached Inner City Press and said, "on the Sri Lankan, you have done well." Inner City Press has sent questions to USGs Malcorra and Ladsous:

"Hello. Asking for an answer before noon: I understand that on the matter of Shavendra Silva, who is named in the S-G's Panel of Experts report on Sri Lanka as in charge of Division 48 which is described engaged in war crimes, ambassadors met with UN Peacekeeping today. I am asking you directly to confirm this, and to state the status of Mr. Silva on the Senior Advisory Group, and at this stage, your view."

At Friday's noon briefing, Inner City Press asked again, and Ban Ki-moon's Deputy Spokesman Eduardo Del Buey said he had no information, to "ask DPKO's spokesman."

Update of 6:34 pm: DPKO's spokesman has written in to note that in response to the request for a confirmation before the noon briefing, he "visited" and sent a text message. Noted. But the request was clear: confirm, which could be done even in a 160 character text message. The problem here is substantive: a UN Secretary General and Under Secretaries General who "have nothing to say" about an alleged war criminal -- or a commander of a division accused of war crimes - advising them.

Inner City Press reiterated, it is a question for Ban and his spokespeople, including because Ban's own High Commissioner for Human Rights wrote him on this topic - as she told Inner City Press at the General Assembly stakeout on February 13 -- and because Silva is in Ban's own report. We are still awaiting an on the record response, which has been re-requested from Ban's office as well as from USG Malcorra and her spokesman.

Update of 2:20 pm, Feb 17: Inner City Press has been sent this by the DPKO spokesman:

"I can confirm that DPKO-DFS leadership today facilitated a meeting with some Member States. As the spokesperson's office has previously said, the selection for this position on the Special Advisory Group is for the Member States. Since the selection has become known to the Secretariat, we have actively facilitated Member States in their discussions to consider this matter. We have nothing to say at this stage on our views of the membership of the Special Advisory Group."

What does it say about Ban's UN that it "has nothing to say" about the nomination as a "Senior Adviser" on Peacekeeping of a military commander named in Ban's own Panel of Experts report on Sri Lanka as engaged in the shelling of hospitals and presumptive execution of those seeking to surrender?

Prior to these developments, the Sri Lankan Mission's action was to send a letter of complaint to Inner City Press, sending a copy to Ban's spokesman Martin Nesirky as well as to some in the UN press corps.

Inner City Press in less than 24 hours published and responded to the letter, citing only some of the many references to Silva's Division 58 in the report.

Watch this site.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Will Aurelien Agbenonci end up in a loony house like Omar Noman - for daring to question UNDP's flagship report validity?

Omar Noman a former head of UNDP Sri-Lanka ended up in a loony house in Britain, apparently for daring to question UNDP's actions in Sri-Lanka and some of UNDP's "special operations" in the South-East Asia region.

Despite the high ranking Noman held inside the UNDP's cupola, the organization could not accept that someone within its ranks disobey and make statements inconsistent to its ideology. Thus UNDP responded to him this way:

Although Mr. Noman is a UNDP staff member, he is currently not authorized to exercise any official function or speak on behalf of UNDP or the United Nations. Any messages under his name are expressed solely in his personal capacity.(click here for this)

At the time of this statement from UNDP, Mr. Noman was the head of a Regional Centre in Sri-Lanka, so imagine UNDP HQs revoking the right to speak on behalf of Organization to a Head of Regional Centre who represent the organization in that region.

Yesterday we all heard the direct accusations from Rwandan Government and UNDP's Representative in Kigali that UNDP's flagship report "Human Development Report 2011" contained inaccurate data, and what more "scandalous" in Agbenonci's statement is that he said:

"The figures were not updated, and did not come from our office (UNDP in Kigali)". "We will get in touch with the HDR office at the headquarters. We are also handling the matter with the Government". (click here for this)
Given the end Mr. Omar Noman had at UNDP for "disagreeing" with his superiors, seems that Mr. Agbenonci might be headed for some rough waters.

There is only one way at UNDP:

UNDP's Free Speech Concept


Monday, October 17, 2011

UNDP's Omar Noman Arrested in UK - UNDP management claims:- "he... lost it"

What should a high profile manager like Omar Noman do (or didn't do) to deserve this treatment from UNDP?

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Ban Ki-moon And Meddling

click here for story



Postered tree during Wimal led UN protest

Ban Ki-moon has appointed a personal panel to investigate Sri Lanka that answers to him, circumventing the UN Security Council. This rather cynically exploits the shallowness of the media to make it look like the UN is investigating Sri Lanka when in fact it’s just Ban Ki-moon. Sri Lankan nationalists have blown this up by calling him a ‘farcical idiot’, among other things, but beneath the rudeness, they may have a point. Recently, the Under-Secretary General for Oversight issued a damning report saying that Ban Ki-moon has been undermined his own anti-corruption body by trying to set up his own competing unit and controlling appointments. In short, meddling.

Ms. Inga-Britt Ahlenius’s cover letter says “Rather than supporting OIOS [the internal corruption watchdog]… you have strived to control it which is to undermine its position.”

Only the cover letter is available online (PDF) but the Washington Post has the whole document and writes:

Ahlenius says that, rather than being an advocate for accountability, Ban, along with his top advisers, has systematically sought to undercut the independence of her office, initially by trying to set up a competing investigations unit under his control and then by thwarting her efforts to hire her own staff…

The departure of Ahlenius, 72, coincides with a period of crisis in the United Nations’ internal investigations division. During the past two years, the world body has shed some of its top investigators. It has also failed to fill dozens of vacancies, including that of the chief of the investigations division in the Office of Internal Oversight Services. That post has been vacant since 2006, leaving a void in the United Nations’ ability to police itself, diplomats say. (WP)

The UN is an arrogant bureaucratic mess which still serves a higher purpose. It does, however, need strategic change to be both respected and useful in the world. I’d always thought that Ban Ki-moon was a vanilla bookend between more dynamic Secretary Generals, but Ms. Ahlenius seems to think he’s actively worse.

Personally, I think that his interference in Sri Lanka violates the UN Charter and causes more problems than it resolves. The diplomatic mess has happened because Ban Ki-moon has personally and rather dictatorially gone around the UN Security Council. This latest missive from inside the UN shows that he may be taking end runs around other institutions as well.

Article syndicated by permission from www.indi.ca

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Letter to the UN – Ban Ki Moon

Warna Hettiarachchi Ontario, Canada

Mr. Ban Ki Moon,
Secretary General
United Nations

March 22nd 2010

Honourable Secretary General of the UN,

The underscored ulterior motifs of your attempts to appoint a panel of “international experts” to investigate and report to you on accountability issues during the winning phase of Sri Lankan Government’s war against terror are well discerned and identifiable. Here are the reasons why:

(1) Since annihilating LTTE terrorists in May 2009, Sri Lankan citizens did not see or hear even a single bullet fired. People are NOW safe, than being blown to bits and pieces by a suicide bomber or an IED (Claymore)? Why aren’t the Western Nations and the UN not happy about that?

(2) What actions have you taken against LTTE for repeated use of abducted children between 10-17 in terror attacks against several successive democratically-elected sovereign governments of Sri Lanka, other than softly written statements?

(3) What actions have you taken against LTTE for using young, delicate children abducted forcibly away from their loving parents and schools to be used as suicide bombers?

(4) You are under pressure from member nations of the US (aka Hillary Clinton), Canada (Liberals), the UK (Miliband and Gordon Brown, et al) and several other liberal European nations to exert pressure on Sri Lankan Government to plead guilty of saving its people, dawning peace and freedom from terror. This would please large Tamil Diaspora sufficiently to cast their votes in favour of Miliband and Brown’s bankrupt Liberal government to bring them back to power at the UK elections in less than a month. Sri Lanka is NOW free of terrorism and terrorists. Please do not force them to have terrorism destroying that little nation. They suffered enough since 1505 under the gun and firepower of Portugese, Dutch and English, Divide-and-rule Politics and a Western-Created Terrorism until May 2009 until peace and TRUE independence of parasitic Crowns of invading foreign powers.

(5) The UN’s vulnerability to corruptions and the latest UN-directly-involved multi-million Dollar UN Corruption deal was expose by Associated Press on Thursday March 18th 2010. Read on:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_re_us/un_un_corruption

And I quote from the article “It is greatly disturbing that an organization plagued by corruption and mismanagement would disband its anti-corruption task force,” said U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, the ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who has proposed requiring the U.N. to do more to fight corruption or risk losing U.S. financial support. “What will the (Obama) administration do to address U.S. taxpayer dollars being misappropriated, squandered, and stolen at the U.N.? We need to demand concrete reform now.” Mr. Moon, tell the world this was not true, but a hoax in its entirety.

(6) Why was the proposal to appoint a committee to Sri Lanka NOT referred to the UN Security Council for approval? Was it due to that sponsors of this “committee” knew Russia and China would veto and reject it at the first hearing?. Then, Mr. Secretary General, tell the world that it was NOT illegal and that it was NOT against the UN Charter to appoint such a panel/committee WITHOUT the approval of the UNSC that will meddle with the internal affairs of a sovereign nation and that such action will not interfere with the constitutional rights of a sovereign nation to protect and guard its territorial integrity. According to the UN’s own scrutiny, no country should be allowed to destroy terrorist threats and the Western Nations must immediately withdraw from Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, which do not even remotely belong to the West. Sri Lanka DOES belong to Sri Lankan Government. They have more rights to fight the world’s most ruthless terrorists and defend their OWN land to bring peace to its people than any foreign force fighting in OTHER countries without any success to wipe out terrorism.

(7) The 118-member strong Non-Aligned Movement reprimanded your move to appoint such committee. And I quote: “The Non-Aligned Movement strongly condemns selective targeting of individual countries, which it deems contrary to the founding principles of the Movement and the United Nations Charter,”Neither the Security Council nor the General Assembly or its subsidiary, Human Rights Council, has made pronouncements on alleged humanrights violations, nor mandated any particular course of action,” the letter noted. http://www.undpi.org/World-News/Non-Aligned-Movement-backs-Sri-Lanka-against-U.N.-chief.html

(8) Global Tamil Forum’s founder is Catholic Priest Emmanuel, who hailed and upheld LTTE suicide bombers as heroes and martyrs, and agreed on using Child Soldiers for their secession to a de-facto neverland of Eelam. Miliband and Gordon Brown participated at the inaugural session of GTF in England 3 weeks ago in desperation to BEG for Tamil votes in Britain. Do you, as Secretary General of the UN agree with that? Your silence on this matter proves the two-faced hypocrisy of the Western Nations and the UN itself.

(9) It can now be logically deduced that the urge to appoint a committee of “Terror-friendly” buffoons and parasites who feed on corrupted millions of Dollars contributed by member Nations and other corrupting elements, was well-manipulated by the UN, in favour of a handful of world’s politicians to stay in power and contribute to more corruption and unaccounted funds? Associated Press says The story of Bistrong and the military equipment suppliers shows how vulnerable the United Nations is to corruption in how the billions of dollars a year that it oversees are spent.”

(10) Did not the UN send its “experts” to Iraq, in search of the elusive and now extinct “Weapons of Mass Destruction” after the US President George W. Bush’s and mostly British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s adamant stiff-upper-lipped confirmation of evidence for existence of such destructive weapons arsenals? How many Millions of Dollars of UN finds were wasted in vein and found absolutely nothing of the sort? Then, Honourable Secretary General, what is the credibility of the UN’s stand on any matter today?

Honourable Sir, let the UN perform its “Proper” duties to keep global fraternity of member states individually “UNITED”, and NOT divided. Let us world citizens see you take the initiative to audit UN’s funding and expenditure structures and have UN transactions strictly regulated.

And Finally, please leave Sri Lanka alone. Let Sri Lanka solve its own internal issues like they destroyed and defeated the world’s most dangerous, four-dimensional terrorist outfit without any of your and most other Western Nations’ assistance.

It was ironic that not even the UN could stop terrorism in Sri Lanka after all these years; it killed one of its Presidents and a Prime Minister of India and a world class statesman/Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar.

If you must interfere, please ask Miliband to personally come to Sri Lanka and help extract landmines laden by his Tamil Tiger buddies to neutralize the mine fields. This will directly help resettlement of the IDP’s still in camps. And that for certain will get Miliband and his millipedes of Liberals led by G. Brown to garner real Tamil votes. Gordon Brown’s Bullying may work for British, but not for Sri Lankans. His intimidations and bullying of Sri Lanka through your UN office is abuse of power and exhibition of insecure profound insanity within.

As for your panel of foreign parasites, with all due respect, Mr Ban Ki Moon, that will not happen as Sri Lankans will not just stand by and wait for foreign intruders come over and take control of their land any more.

Your response in this matter is gratefully appreciated.

Thank you.

Warna Hettiarachchi
Ontario, Canada

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

At UN, CPJ on Pariah States N. Korea and on Sri Lanka, Buying Tickets, Iran's Eye

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, February 16 -- The Committee to Protect Journalists on February 16 called on UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to be more forceful about the importance of press freedom. Inner City Press asked CPJ's Asia expert Bob Deitz about what Mr. Ban and CPJ have done as the Sri Lankan government of Mahinda Rajapaksa has closed down opposition newspapers, reporters have been killed and websites blocked. Video here, from Minute 40:08.

Deitz said that "no one knows how to handle the direction in which the [Sri Lankan] government is going, which is not friendly to the media." He said it might join the "pariah states" of Myanmar, "Burma, North Korea and Zimbabwe," but for feisty journalists who put themselves at risk.

But as to what CPJ does, Weitz said "right now we are hanging back with a lot of people," trying to figure out whether to "come down hard or engage in quiet advocacy."

Afterwards, Inner City Press asked Deitz for more specifics about this "quiet" approach, which the UN seems to share, in the most benign interpretation of Ban's visit in May 2009 after what even the UN called the "bloodbath on the beach" and since.

Even the UN's Children and Armed Conflict mandate, which belatedly sent Patrick Cammaert to Sri Lanka in December, never had him brief the Press afterwards. Radhika Coomaraswamy, when Inner City Press asked her about this silence last week, said that Cammaert went to Europe to get married after his trip, then it was "too late" to brief the press about his visit.

Deitz said that the opposition press in Sri Lanka asks that particular journalists' cases "not be publicized," as it would only make things worse. "Just get us out of here," Deitz said such journalists ask, adding the CPJ helps with plane tickets.

Another correspondent remarked afterwards is that "quiet advocacy is what diplomats do, not journalists or their organizations."


Masked rally for press freedom in Sri Lanka, Jan 2009, UN and CPJ's tickets out not shown

Inner City Press asked CPJ's deputy director Robert Mahoney about the UN's own envoy to Somalia Ahmedou Ould Abdallah having called on a "moratorium" on Somali journalists reporting on the killing of civilians by the African Union peacekeepers of AMISOM.

Mahoney said it is up to journalists to make their own editorial decisions. Ironically, Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky has, at least in his first month on the job, said such things as "that's not a story."

Also on the podium was Newsweek journalist and filmmaker Maziar Bahari, about whom CNN's Fareed Zakaria devoted the foreword to CPJ's study. As Bahari spoke, a representative from Iran's Mission to the UN sat in the UN press hall's front row, taking notes.

The Iranian mission has invited UN correspondents -- including this one -- to a celebration of Iran's national day on February 18. Inner City Press told Bahari about the event, encouraging him to come and cover it. Watch this space.

Footnote: three hours after the CPJ press conference on its report, "Attacks on the Press in 2009," which names North Korea as the world's most censored country, Inner City Press asked Mr. Ban's senior advisor Kim Won-soo and political advisor Lynn Pascoe if they had even raised press freedom during their recent trip to Pyongyang. Video here.

No, Mr. Pascoe said. Inner City Press asked Mr. Kim to respond for Mr. Ban on CPJ's wider call to be more forceful on press freedom. While he answered about UNDP in North Korea, he did not answer on press freedom. Inner City Press has at UN noon briefings asked for Mr. Kim to come and answer questions more often. We'll see.

In another UN footnote, CPJ's genial Mr. Deitz granted an interview to a student reporter, Melissa Best, whose piece should air as part of WNYC's Radio Rookies program. Ms. Best, who aspired to be a US diplomat, told Inner City Press that North Korea's nuclear ambitions might call for more stick and less carrots. The show should air -- and Internet -- in June...

* * *

Denying Corruption of Citigroup and BofA, Obiangs Cite Obama, ExxonMobil's Investment

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, February 15 -- Ten days after the release by the U.S. Senate of a reporting on evasion by the son of Equatorial Guinea's President for Life Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue of anti-money laundering controls by and at Citigroup, Bank of America, Wachovia / Wells Fargo and others, the Obiang regime fired back, calling the report racist and citing in its defense the election of Barack Obama.

Inner City Press is putting the Obiangs' memo online, here.

The Senate report exhaustively shows how Teodorin and his lawyers moved tens of millions of dollars through Citibank and Wachovia (owned by Wells Fargo since the financial meltdown), and used accounts at Bank of America, City National and other banks. The report described how Teodorin

"brought over $100 million into the United States using wire transfer systems at just two U.S. financial institutions, Wachovia Bank and Citibank. Neither system had been programmed to detect or block wire transfers bearing his name. In 2009... Citibank declined to take the same action due to projections that identifying, freezing, and investigating these wire transfers would generate too much work for its anti-money laundering staff...From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Obiang used accounts at three U.S. banks, Union Bank of California, Bank of America, and Citibank, often with Mr. Berger’s assistance, to deposit, transfer and spend nearly $10 million. Most of these funds were wire transferred from accounts in Equatorial Guinea held in the name of Mr. Obiang or two EG companies he controlled, Somagui Forestal and Socage."

To this, the Government of Equatorial Guinea in a communique sent to the Press on February 15, the President's Day holiday in the U.S., argues that

"According to Equatoguinean legislation, as occurs exactly in the most of the world, the natural and legal persons, as occurs in this case with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, are perfectly authorized to do business and maintain other types of jobs at the margin of their Ministerial obligations."

Teodorin's "marginal" business includes a $30 million mansion in Malibu, a jet and recording studio, among other things. Previously he and his president for life father Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo moved their money, like Pinochet, into the U.S. through Riggs Bank.

Inner City Press and its Fair Finance Watch dug into these connections, including to Spain's Santander Bank and HSBC, when the Obiang disgraced Riggs was being sold to PNC Bank. Click here for coverage in Le Monde, in French.

The U.S. Federal Reserve did little at that time. With the major banks it regulates now implicated again in corrupt money laundering, what will the supposedly chastened Federal Reserve do?


President for life Obiang, speaking at the UN, Citi and BofA not shown

The "Equatoguinean" response complains at the Senate report deals only with African corruption -- Angola with HSBC, Gabon's Omar Bongo with Citigroup, Nigeria's Abubakar with Suntrust and the ubiquitous Citibank -- and not any other continent. In this, it echoes the defenders of Sudan's Omar al Bashir, that the International Criminal Court and its prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo have so far indicted only African defendants.

But Equatorial Guinea goes further. Its cover email to Inner City Press argues that "it can be considered as an authentic insult to Africa, and more so after the people of the United States have voted in the majority for a President of African origin."

Then, in capital letters, Equatorial Guinea screams that

"In Africa and in Equatorial Guinea we are tired of BEING TREATED FOR CENTURIES LIKE INHUMAN BEASTS, ON WHICH ALL THE BRUTAL AND EVIL BEHAVIOURS POSSIBLE ARE BLAMED. This is again so verifiable in this case that even different media of the United States have written these days, in regards to this case, THAT THE FAMILY OBIANG PRACTICES CANNIBALISM."

Another of the ICC's and Ocampo's indictees, Jean Pierre Bemba the previous Vice President of the Congo, argued during his campaign against Joseph Kabila that, "I am not a cannibal!"

The Equatoguinean defense that's closest to the mark is that

"We also wish to put on the record that the United States is the country from which comes the highest foreign investment in Equatorial Guinea, which exceeds 12 billion USA dollars, and that no American corporation has complained of fraudulent behaviour of the Government. We also expect the Senate Subcommittee to be consistent with the criteria of the North American companies."

Or should it be the other way around? Major U.S. investors with the Obiangs include ExxonMobil, Marathon Oil, Hess Corporation, and Noble Energy. We will have more on all this.

Click here for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters footage, about civilian deaths in Sri Lanka.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

UN's Ban Slammed by Norway's Juul, on Burma and Sri Lanka Trips, Should Oslo Be Canceled?

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, August 19 -- As UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon returned to New York after ten days in South Korea, soon to turn around and visit Norway by the end of the month, he was confronted by an embarrassing leak in the Norwegian foreign ministry of Deputy Permanent Representative Mona Juul's unflattering assessment of his "failed" trips to Myanmar and Sri Lanka, his flying into rages and ineffective leadership.

That Ms. Juul is also the spouse of Ban's Under Secretary General Terje Roed Larsen makes the criticism all the more telling. What will Ban Ki-moon do?

While Ban was in South Korea, a month after Myanmar's Senior General Than Shwe refused to allow him a meeting or photo op with democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, precisely such a visit was allowed to U.S. Senator Jim Webb. When Ban's Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe was asked by Inner City Press and others if Ban had any comment on Webb's more successful visit -- he also left the country with another Suu Kyi visitor, John Yettaw, freeing him from seven years of hard labor -- Ms. Okabe tersely said no, no comment. Later her Office issued a "response to questions at the noon briefing" begrudgingly acknowledging the Webb visit.


At UN, Mona Juul (at left), Ban and trips not shown

Ban's record on Sri Lanka has gotten even worse. During his visit in late May, he smiled as Tamil children imprisoned by the government in UN funded camps at Manik Farms were forced to sing his name. Now, those camps have become flooded, including with raw sewage. The government blames the UN, and Ban's UN has said nothing.

What is the purpose of Ban's planned August 31 visit to Norway? Should it not now be called off, and Team Ban get back to their actual mending work -- including addressing the proliferating nepotism and corrupt hiring scandals -- at the UN?