Showing posts with label Heather Simpson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heather Simpson. Show all posts

Thursday, February 21, 2013

New Zealand press alleges: "Helen Clark (is) a lesbian" ...

From New Zealand with love : 
- a story of a lot, gay sex, drunken parties, drugs, troughing and bribery.

Click here for this in full at : http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/tag/jonathan-hunt/

All available lines to New York will be taken up tonight by Labour as they seek guidance from Helen Clark after Ian Wishart dropped a bombshell on Labour in the latest issue of Investigate. This is an epic Tory party style sex scandal, except all the players are Labour elite. It’s got the lot, gay sex, drunken parties, drugs, troughing and bribery.

The article is huge and can be summarised as follows:
  • Claims Tim Barnett encouraged a 14 year old to leave school to work in his office. Is this grooming?
  • Claims former Mayor Gary Moore also part of enticement with job offers. Labour pals stick together.
  • Truancy Officer was Labour supporter and aided and abetted truancy. More pals involved.
  • Government money used to fly 14 year old numerous times around country. Troughing.
  • Given free reign around parliament and Beehive as a 14-15 year old. WTF!
  • Had Speaker Jonathan Hunt intervening in favour of 14 year old with security at Parliament. What else was Hunt involved in?
  • Alleges Tim Barnett confides in 14 year old about Helen Clark, Heather Simpson and Judith Tizard being involved in lesbian affairs. First time this has aired in a major publication to my knowledge.
  • Alleges Chris Carter was phoned and intervened on 14 year old’s behalf with CYFS to release 14 year old.
  • Chris Carter denies knowing Hamish Jevan Goulter but Goulter has photos of Carters wedding on his Facebook page. Oh dear!
  • Chris Carter denies Goulter at wedding. Pants on Fire?
  • Chris Carter “remembers” pinging Goulter in parliament and “sending him home” to Christchurch. Very strange explanation
  • Investigate holds emails between Goulter and Chris Carter arranging wedding details Has Carter lied?
  • Barnett alleges that Goulter was trying to trace his birth mother and was emotional. Very strange reply to serious questions. How very intimate of Barnett to know all about the state of mind of a 14 year old.
  • Lianne Dalziel knowing Goulter but Investigate publishes a photo of them together. Oh dear, can Lianne ever tell the truth?
  • Dalziel apologises to Goulter in a Facebook chat for denying she knew him. Liar, Liar, pants on Fire.
  • Tim Barnett and Labour functionary and ADHB board member Dr. Ian Scott conspire to get drunk Goulter off work to continue partying. More grooming behaviour, two drunk older gay men assisting a drunk underage teenager to abscond from work.
  • Tim Barnett provided taxpayer funded taxi-chits to Goulter regularly. Oh they do trough don’t they.
  • Alleges Helen Clark overrode Jacinda Ardern on issue of Goulter drinking at Premier House. Jacinda Ardern so far is the only Labour person who looks like and acts like a person with responsibility.
  • Drank frequently with Michael Cullen, Lianne Dalziel, Ruth Dyson, and Annette King. Old soak eh Lianne? Always on the turps.
  • Goulter alleges he spent considerable time in Jonathan Hunt’s office and flat, alleges he could do what he likes.
  • Goulter alleges that Tim Barnett, his partner Ramon, Chris Carter, Charles Chauvel regularly smoked marijuana with him.
  • Alleges Chris Carter and him were in regular contact and Carter enjoyed being out with “twinkies”.
  • Alleges Michael Cullen also smoked Marijuana at Labour Conference.
  • Carter says “no cigarette has passed his lips in 30 years”. Interesting choice of description. I have never heard of a joint referred to as a “cigarette”.
  • Goulter alleges that Tim Barnett made homosexual advances on him.
  • Goulter alleges Barnett made him sit down on a chair with him, and lunged and tried to kiss him.
  • Goulter was at one time under the “care of the Speaker’s Office”. Whatever that is supposed to mean.
  • Alleges Judith Tizard paid Mika hush money to keep Goulter quiet in election year via Arts grants. I always wondered what Tizard actually did, now we know, she allegedly paid the bribes.
This is a truly spell-binding article. The details are very clear but I don’t doubt that there is a fair bit of embellishment. Basically Jacinda Ardern is the only person coming out of this story looking completely normal, sensible even. That must surely be a worry for the Labour Party if Jacinda Ardern looks sensible.

Tim Barnett is pictured, by Goulter, as a typical poof, preying on/grooming youngsters and trying to cheat on his partner. Basically a mini-me Chris Carter with out the camel jockeys. It is clear that Goulter is (or was) a teenage star-chaser  and no doubt rated his access a lot higher than the reality was.

However you have to ask what possible motive could a member of parliament have for allowing a troubled teen who has basically been exited from school hang around with him to the extent that he did.

Barnett has been caught lying and so has Chris Carter. Especially the wedding angle. And that sad old poof Jonathon Hunt needs to be asked some hard questions too.

This story shows pretty much the entire senior echelon of Labour with the exception of Jacinda Ardern and Phil Goff (ironically described as “a bit of a nobody”) seem to be a bunch of fag-hags, pederasts and perverts who once they get a little bit of power will use it unwisely.

The one who got caught out in the biggest lie however was Lianne Dalziel who facebooked to Goulter how she had lied about knowing him! Actually I would go so far as to call it outrageous that a child is allowed to attach himself to the inner core of the Labour government, with access to parliament to seemingly come and go as he pleases and have what can only be described as an inappropriate relationship with non family adult males.

Barnett’s alleged comments about the bulldog and the Clark/Simpson/Tizard triangle of terror is priceless. Pure gold.

One thing that doesn’t hold true to me about the traditional description of Clark’s Labour governemnt is that it doesn’t appear that Heather Simpson knew anything about it otherwise the kid’s bum would be whacked back to Mincer Mika faster than you could say “oh Helen”. I simply can’t imagine she would be loose enough politically to let an uppity, teenage bi-sexual drama-queen near the circle of influence. I know real bad pun.

The one thing in Goulters favour is he had the good sense to call Tony Milne and Michael Wood names…plus he hates Jacinda, and writes off Young Labour as “a bunch of smelly fat unattractive people”. Two words people, Sonny and Thomas.

A truly bizarre account of the inner working of Labour. Now we watch and see what falls out. There are certainly some large inconsistencies in the stories but also some information that could only have been gleaned by actually being there on the inside.

Click here for this in full at : http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/tag/jonathan-hunt/

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Shedding light into UNDP's secret organigram (who is who)

UNDP Watch will begin publishing all Internal Organigrams of UNDP 

Public has the right to know who is who at UNDP

-----

United Nations Development Programme
1 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017
Tel: (212) 906-5000
Fax: (212) 906-5001
Cable address: UNDEVPRO NEWYORK
Email address: HQ@undp.org; http://www.undp.org

Administrator

Helen Clark/Ms
(212) 906-5791

Associate Administrator

Rebeca Grynspan/Ms
(212) 906-5788

----

Executive Office of Administrator (ExO)
Fax: (212) 906-5778

Director and Chief of Staff:
Abdoulaye Mar Dieye/Mr
(212) 906-6768

Special Adviser to the Administrator:

Heather Simpson/Ms
(212) 906-6338

Policy Specialists:

Pedro Manuel Moreno
Anna Hjartardottir
Sarah Renner
Natalia Linou
Martin Hart-Hansen

Administrative Specialist:

Alan J Lee
(212) 906-6570

Executive Associate to the Administrator:

Annette Edra
(212) 906-5770

Executive Associate to the Associate Administrator:

Astrid Bissainthe
(212) 906-5789

Personal Associate to the Director:

Zelalem Abedje
(212) 906-6938

--------------




Sunday, October 23, 2011

Heather Simpson forced out of the shadow:- Officially the de-jure Chief of Staff

For those at UNDP who called Heather Simpson the machiavellian schemer who would always be careful NOT to take a picture with Helen Clark while traveling with her around the globe, now is the time to really sh** bricks.

HEATHER SIMPSON (H2)
IS
CHEF DE CABINET
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATOR
@UNDP




Yes, you heard that well. After the direct threat to Helen Clark from a "powerful government" at the last Executive Board meeting, Uncle Helen could trust no one else at UNDP's cupola with the next move :

CHANGE UNDP

Only Heather Simpson can pull this off. Will she be able to navigate the corrupt waters of internal politics at UNDP... only time would tell. Eventhough, "time" is the only thing Uncle Helen doesn't have. She has a deadline to change UNDP forcefully by end of 31st December 2011.

How can you change a specialized professional network like UNDP, were most of current management has been trained and certified by top "capacity building companies" like MI6, GRU, ASIS, CSIS, FE, SUPO, DGSE, AIVD, ISI, SASS, SEBIN, etc??

Well only a NZSIS certified, who has also navigated the New Zealand politics for almost quarter century can do it.

One thing is for sure, Uncle Helen cannot return in New Zealand and the only way is to navigate her ship in the international waters for "awhile", thus brace up UNDP, you aint seen nothing yet!


Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Ros-Lehtinen earthquake is being heard at UNDP - Uncle Helen pulls a Mark Malloch Brown one (sends most of ASGs home) major cuts on the way!

Jens Wandel to replace Akiko Yuge at UNDP's Bureau of Management


Two months ago, on Sept 6th 2011, Amb. Joseph M Torsella of USUN, speaking in front of the UNDP's Executive Board said:

Given the increasing and appropriate demand for information access by both the international community and domestic constituencies, we have reached a juncture where we have to ask the hard question: Will UNDP adopt full public disclosure as its policy, and when? The answer will have a profound impact on the perception of UNDP’s integrity and on the support it receives from donor and program countries in the years ahead.

For the sake of UNDP’s future, that answer must be “yes.” Because full transparency is an obligation we owe not just to UNDP’s donors, but also to the vulnerable population that UNDP serves: they will be the ultimate beneficiaries of the enhanced effectiveness that comes with the sunshine of public scrutiny. Because UNDP should be a leader, not a follower, on issues of public management standards. And because at a time when all of us are demanding transparency and good governance in both developed and developing states, we should ask no less of UNDP.

What you read above was not "only for UNDP's own sake", but also for the sake of all those State Department's fellows who have invested heavily in past years (decades) in UNDP, and whose budget is about to be cut by Illeana Ros-Lehtinen and GOP majority at the US House of representatives.

This time there are no Europeans to cough-up the money like they did back in 2007, when Illeana Ros-Lehtinen managed to cut almost $70 Million from UNDP in retaliation to UNDP's abuses in North Korea, Myanmar and Iran. Europeans are broke! So is the US's uncle Sam.

So Helen Clark, or let's better say - Heather Simpson, got the message and since mid September has been preparing in secret a plan of actions that would make radical changes in UNDP by 31st December 2011.

The secret plan, who seem to liken the one of Mark Malloch Brown in mid 90's, will remove almost all ASGs and D2 and strat a major reshuffling of UNDP's COs. In the plan is also included a 10% reduction of UNDP offices, specially those in Eastern Europe or CIS in countries where democratic reforms and development are quite advance the "UNDP's assistance is no longer relevant".

Among those who have received notice this week is Akiko Yuge. Jens Wandel should be the one to replace Akiko, but will Jens be comfortable to work with corrupt Darshak Shah and others at Treasury or Procurement ? Will see !

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

A Helen Clark's friend is going to Afghanistan: What are some good gay clubs in Kabul?

CLICK HERE FOR THE ANSWER

Goooooood Morning Kabul ! Finally UNDP has a GAY solution to Hamid Kharzai's corruption problem! Allahu Akbar !



God does have a sense of humour!

Hamid Kharzai just walked out of his private offices after a long meeting with his new gay anti-corruption Advisor from New Zealand, Mr. Chris Carter. He walked towards his Chief of Cabinets office, smiling open his door and screamed - "allahu akbar - why haven't you told me that there is another way to haven other than corrupt money? allahu akbar !"

Maybe what is in the second page of secret briefing at Nr.10 which was accidentally revealed by Andrew Mitchell yesterday, was the proposed British solution to Kharzai's sickness.

The only thing though is that maybe the New Zealanders doesn't understand the United Nations rules that clearly state that: - "anyone who is hired by United Nations at any capacity has to give up all his public or private functions and opt out of any political party prior to engage into UN business".

But hey if Helen Clark is still a member of International Socialist what the heck - who cares about a NZ MP from Te Atatu.






“Uncle Helen turning UNDP into a cove of corrupt NZ labour politicians”

Click here to read this on FAIRFACTSMEDIA.COM

I am sure the good folk at UNDP Watch are looking forward to the arrival of uncle’s close confidant Chris Carter.

Above is a headline I noted on their most excellent blog, complete with the delightful picture on the left.

At the weekend, UNDP Watch linked to a couple of stories noting the prospective arrival of former Liarbour MP , the credit card abusing Chris Carter.

The blog also linked to a post from here. There was a fair debate in the comments underneath.

Thank you guys, you are welcome. They asked:

Is Helen Clark turning U.N.D.P. into a ultra left wing cove for NZ Communists??

Well, who knows? But now that Darren Hughes was had the police inquiries concerning the sex allegations against him dropped, it does raise the prospect of him making a threesome with Clark and fellow gay Chris Carter. Unlike the allegations of certain others close to Uncle, there won’t be any travel restrictions against him!

In the meantime, Chris Carter continues to provide much entertainment. I am sure he will provide much copy for UN Watch and UNDP Watch when he makes it to New York.

Hat Tip: Whale Oil, UNDP Watch

Popularity: 1% [?]

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Helen's mother dead at 87 (may she rest in peace) - but Helen's priority seems to be the saving of NZ Labour (did UNDP paid for this trip?)

Clark is back, campaigning hard for Labour


by WHALEOIL on AUGUST 17, 2011 · 9 COMMENTS

Helen Clark is back in the coun­try and it appears is cam­paign­ing hard for Labour. This ‘inau­gural event’ is being adver­tised and autho­rised by Carol Beaumont.

What do we know about this arrangement?

NOTE: This PO Box resolves to a nat­ural skin care com­pany called Paci­fica Organ­ics… The sole direc­tor of this com­pany is Jenny Agnew who also hap­pens to have a grass­roots Labour web­site.. and is a well known Labour supporter

So this inau­gural lec­ture series is a Labour fundraiser and Helen’s rais­ing the cash. I won­der who is pay­ing Helen Clark’s bills while she’s here fundrais­ing for Labour?

She is back run­ning the campaign!

Has Trevor been given the arse?

Friday, June 10, 2011

Uncle Helen's boy: - Chris Carter still on message


So Chris Carter’s look ing for ward to work ing with his old boss in the New York office of the Labour Party.

Pleased to see that on Good Morning yesterday he continued to maintain message discipline.


Monday, May 16, 2011

U.N. Agency Prepares to Resume Aid to Libya Even if Qaddafi Remains in Power

click here for story


By George Russell

While the U.S. and NATO demand that Libyan despot Muammar al-Qaddafi relinquish control and stop slaughtering his own people, the United NationsDevelopment Program is secretively planning for a quick return to action in the country, even if Libya’s rebels fail to drive him from power.

UNDP, the U.N.’s flagship anti-poverty agency, abandoned its previously close embrace of the Qaddafi family as the anti-regime protests turned into widespread armed rebellion and NATO air forces began supporting the often-beleaguered rebels. The agency’s non-Libyan staffers left the country, along with other U.N. personnel, and now work out of Cairo.

But now, UNDP bureaucrats are planning to return with a “forward looking framework of likely recovery policies,” even if the rebels are not successful, according to a planning document obtained by Fox News. The proposed price tag: $25.3 million, though the document also says the numbers are “no more than estimates of what would be required to kick-start program initiatives.”

Evidence of the detailed contingency planning was hastily scrubbed from a UNDP website the day after Fox News raised questions about the activity, and sensitive wording was rephrased in the text that remained. A Fox News request for the specific six-page document that summed up UNDP’s thinking was denied, on the grounds that the document “is in draft form and is still under discussion.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE UNDP WEB PAGE AS IT FIRST APPEARED

CLICK HERE FOR THE UNDP WEB PAGE AS LATER MODIFIED

Now, “in anticipation of the possibility of a ceasefire/political agreement or a victory by the opposition, UNDP is already preparing to adjust and scale up its programming inside Libya,” according to the internal document on “recovery and transition in post-crisis Libya,” obtained by Fox News despite UNDP’’s refusal to provide it.

Even if rebel control is limited to the eastern half of the country, where the rebellion is strongest, the “recovery policies” can be used by the U.N. agency to “support early recovery activities, including capacity development support for local government and civil society.”

And if Qaddafi falls, as NATO leaders and European government leaders are demanding, UNDP intends to be quickly in place to provide “advisory support to the new government on transitional arrangements and processes” (including a new constitution and elections) as well as a strategy for “public administration reform,” and “support for national dialogue and reconciliation,” according to the contingency document.

“UNDP has a critical role to play,” the paper declares, “given its expertise in such areas as transitional governance, national dialogue and reconciliation; youth and civil society; strengthening national and local governance institutions and restoring public service delivery; and (re-)establishing the rule of law and community safety.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE ‘POST-CRISIS’ DOCUMENT

There is considerable irony to UNDP’s claims of expertise, as the agency has been responsible for many similarly-named policies in the previous decade, all carried out with the full support, and very often the full financing, of the Qaddafi regime itself.

UNDP, which has operated inside Libya in close cooperation with the government since 1974-- put its $19.7 million local program for 2011-2014 on hold when the fighting became heavy.

That program was developed entirely in cooperation with the Qaddafi government, using Libyan money, and called for programs under such headings as “Strengthening national institutions toward public service delivery; and strengthening national data management systems,” and “Strengthening Government efforts on economic diversification through increased focus on small and medium enterprises, youth capacity development, and economic empowerment of women.”

The programs were to be carried out in close cooperation with a variety of Qaddafi government ministries, as well as non-governmental organizations and civil society organizations—all of which, in pre-upheaval Libya, were closely controlled by the Qaddafi government or members of the despot’s family.

CLICK HERE FOR THE 2011-2014 PROGRAM

UNDP’s previous Libyan program, for 2006-2009 (later extended through 2010), was also developed in close cooperation with the regime, and had such headings as “Improved governance at local and central levels.”

Under the governance rubric, it included the promise to “continue to support national capacity building efforts in the area of good governance, including human rights,” and conduct “a comprehensive technical review of the legal system in Libya, in support of the country's efforts to promote the rule of law, and to modernize the judicial system at the national and local levels.”

The projected cost of that program was initially estimated at $16 million, with all of the money likewise coming from the Qaddafi regime.

CLICK HERE FOR THE 2006-2009 PROGRAM

The program, along with its successor, was carried out under an arrangement known as “national execution,” or NEX, which is, according to a UNDP handbook, “a cooperative operational arrangement entailing...overall responsibility and assumption of accountability for the formulation and management of the program country of UNDP-supported programs and projects.”

Translation: the programs were run by the Qaddafi government itself, with UNDP providing technical advice and its seal of approval. For its role, UNDP takes a management fee of about 3 percent of total program spending.

(The NEX “modality” is used by UNDP in many if not most of the 167 countries where it operates, including some of the world’s worst despotisms—Zimbabwe, for example.)

In its latest, confidential “post-crisis” planning paper, however, UNDP admits that ordinary Libyans do not think highly of some of the institutions the U.N. agency “supported” in its previous multi-year development plans in Libya.

“Rule of law institutions, including the justice sector and police, have suffered a severe erosion of trust among the Libyan people,” the document declares. “Reforming these institutions to regain that trust is indispensible to ensure security and stability during the recovery process.”

Among other things, as a medium-term priority, it suggests “Increase access to justice for vulnerable communities by establishing legal advice services, raising awareness of rule of law and human rights, and training for traditional justice providers.”

Those solutions seem pallid alongside the description of the failings of the Libyan justice system in the U.S. State Department’s latest human rights examination of the country. There, the system is described as essentially a sham. As the report puts it: “At his discretion Qaddafi and his close associates may interfere in the administration of justice by altering court judgments, replacing judges, or manipulating the appeal system. The judiciary failed to incorporate international standards for fair trials, detention, and imprisonment.”

Libyan local government institutions, the UNDP document says, were also not very commendable; they “were weak and had limited planning and implementation capacities.” The paper noted that “immediate and longer-term support to local authorities and development institutions would be critical.”

The paper also suggests “scaled-up support” for a campaign to rid Libya of land mines, noting that “the use of landmines and the proliferation of small arms during the conflict are creating new risks to community security.” (Over the past seven years, the paper notes, the regime had imported $1.7 billion worth of small arms “from European countries.”)

As it happens, a similar anti-land-mine campaign was previously carried out under UNDP auspices in Libya, in cooperation with a local non-government organization that was supervised by the Qaddafi Charity and Development Foundation.

The foundation was run by Muammar al-Qaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam, considered before the latest rebellion as Libya’s most likely benign reformer. (In those not-so-long-ago days, UNDP hailed its relationship with the Qaddafi Foundation as a “long and healthy partnership.”

Since the situation in Libya remains highly fluid, the latest post-crisis paper says, “needs and options will obviously vary depending on what happens.”

But whatever direction comes next, the document makes clear, UNDP intends to remain as close to the center of things as possible—just as it did in the Qaddafi-dominated past.

George Russell is executive editor of Fox News and can be found on Twitter@GeorgeRussell.

Monday, May 2, 2011

U.N. Postponing $38 Million "Bucks for Bashar" Syrian Aid Plan

click here for story


By George Russell

As Syria’s dictatorship continued to kill rebellious protesters with artillery shells and gunfire over the weekend, the United Nations Development Program, or UNDP, abruptly announced it was postponing a five-year, $38 million plan to support the government of President Bashar Assad, a plan slated for approval in June.

In a terse announcement, the U.N.’s flagship anti-poverty agency said it was “deferring” consideration of the plan “to ensure that the new program addresses the evolving development needs of the Syrian people.”

UNDP’s sudden decision to put its Syrian program in the deep-freeze came just two days after Fox News disclosed details of the impending plan, described in internal documents as the continuation of “a well-functioning partnership with the government.

A day later, UNDP’s intentions were condemned in Washington by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who called the proposed plan of support a “potential Bucks for Bashar scandal,” and called for a cutoff of U.S. taxpayer support for UNDP.

Assad’s troops and security forces have killed hundreds of anti-government protesters in the past few weeks, according to human rights organizations, and over the weekend showed no signs of stopping.

There was no reference to the Assad regime’s violence in the UNDP announcement about its new course of action. Instead, the agency only noted that “as events have unfolded in Syria, UNDP formed the view that a deferral of submission of the next country program to its executive board was necessary.”

The agency said nothing about when it might bring forward the proposal again.

UNDP’s new five-year plan for Syria involved work in five areas, the agency said: “promoting economic growth; enhancing institutional, administrative and legal frameworks, strengthening environmental management; improving disaster prevention and management; and fighting HIV/AIDS.” The program involved working on projects with Syria’s ministries of justice, information, foreign affairs, economy and trade, communications, local administration, tourism, social affairs and labor, health, transport, electricity and environment.”

All of those ministries are closely controlled by the Assad dictatorship.

Ironically, much of UNDP’s proposed work for legal and judicial “enhancement” in Syria in the past centered on the ancient city of Daraa, where UNDP had worked with the Syrian government to improve “the administration of and access to justice for citizens.”

Click here for the UNDP Program in Daraa.

Daraa has in past weeks emerged as one of the strongest points of popular rejection of the Assad regime -- and over the weekend was the particular focal point for ground and artillery attack by Syrian military and security units.”

George Russell is executive editor of Fox News and can be found on Twitter @GeorgeRussell.