"....The staff is sick and tired of the impunity extended by the office of the Secretary-General to senior managers for their failings especially in situations where it has led to death and disability....."
- UN Staff Union
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Satyam vs. Siemens Corruption: The Difference is in Ponzinomics
The financial crisis exposes emperors with no clothes. Witness Madoff. But naked truths are not only emerging for those dealings with obscure financial instruments. Dramatic exposure in the corporate business sector is also taking place.
Last month we discussed the corruption scandal surrounding Siemens, the multinational giant, which has agreed to pay billions in fines and fees. With the holiday came a short truce. New Year had not even taken place and we are hit by the enormity of the Satyam’s corporate fraud, labelled as India's Enron.
Bribery and fraud by business corporations is not new, of course. And in fact the Siemens bribery case is a longstanding one, preceding the financial crisis. Corporate fraud and corruption are not unique to developing or to industrialized countries, obviously. They can take place anywhere. They do.
The magnitude and timing proximity between the Siemens and Satyam corporate scandals may tempt some to rush and generalize, lumping such corporate scandals together as belonging to the same kilt. That would be unfortunate. There is a fundamental difference between those two cases. It relates to “Ponzinomics.” While Satyam shows clear features of a Ponzi scheme, the Siemens case doesn’t. This difference matters.
For starters, Satyam’s bribery to obtain some contracts –including evidently improper benefits years ago to a former high official of the World Bank– appears to have been just one sideshow within a wholly fraudulent ‘house of cards’ company. A venture with largely fictitious assets and inflated revenues and profits over the years, but with a facade of a major and respected IT company.
Virtually the entire company was based on a Ponzi-like scheme, in which unsuspecting investors, shareholders and even many of their own staff continued to unwittingly support a bubble created through a fraudulent web of financial accounting lies and a careful misinformation strategy. In such large and publicly listed company (in multiple jurisdictions) this fraud at Satyam could have hardly taken place through the sole actions of their Chairman, Ramalinga Raju -- in spite of what he claimed in his resignation letter (why would he suddendly tell the truth in that venue?...). Complicity by some other in the company is being investigated, as is the role of their external international auditor, PwC.
Now onto the German conglomerate Siemens, a company that produces and actually deliversmany sophisticated real products, such as electronics and electrical engineering solutions for the industry, energy and healthcare sectors. It is very different than Satyam. Siemens does have real assets, backed by such production of real goods and services. Siemens, in order to ‘compete’, and to pad its bottom line and gain market share, had engaged in wholesale bribery as a corporate strategy, so to obtain contracts fraudelently rather than through level-field competition. Under this type of corruption, a welfare loss to society takes place because contracts are not awarded due to to real cost and productivity advantage, but according to having illegally paid government officials under the table. Further, there is the serious societal and ethical cost of corrupting senior government officials in (often poorer) investment-recipient countries and in undermining public institutions.
At the same time, in the case of Siemens, a real product is produced and delivered, and the assets of the multinational company are largely real, and reflected (more or less) accurately in its own balance sheet. In fact, until no long ago, corporate bribery was not only legal under German law, but such 'necessary expenses' were tax deductible. Talking about financial transparency: even the bribes themselves would have been reflected in their financial statements! Quite a difference with Satyam...
Not that one evil is more or less damaging than the other. We are simply pointing out that there are crucial differences. Satyam joins the group of collapsed companies due to Ponzi-scheme-like-behaviour, akin to Enron, WorldComm and Parmalat. Conversely, Siemens joins the group of bribers as a corporate strategy, akin to Lockheed (of the 1970s, which spurred US foreign anti-bribery legislation), or more recentlyHalliburton, and VW… Siemens’ stock price has not been battered in recent months. Satyam's has.
A Satyam-type of Ponzian company tends to crash when hovering needles poke their fragile bubble. This is more prone to take place in a financial crisis or a downturn. Thus we now witness the Ponzi-like collapse of the house of cards. This has loud consequences, often beyond the company itself, due to loss of trust in other companies in their industry, and even country-wide. Satyam’s scandal has been associated with massive overall losses in the Indian stock market, not to mention the dire effects on the battered stock price of Satyam itself and of other giants in the Indian IT industry.
By construction, Ponzi mechanisms cannot go on forever. A self-correcting process eventually takes place when the bubble has grown too large and too feeble for any further web of lies to lure additional funds. Obviously, if external oversight, transparency and auditing would have worked, detecting such Ponzi schemes much earlier may have taken place, which would have reduced the damage.
But even when such due diligence fails, the storm eventually exposes (or imply the wind blows away...) the house of cards. With that, the game is over. Satyam’s chairman Raju, in his resignation letter, famously said: “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten.” He should have known that if you do mount a wild tiger, and are afraid to dismount, then it will be a longer ride, until the tiger will eventually dismount and eat you anyway...
In the Siemens type of corruption, the massive firm does not collapse due to corruption, even if the reputational cost (and fines) are far from negligible. A few days after it was mightily fined, Siemens won a billion-plus contract for a Iraqi power plant. And despite settling and paying huge fines, Siemens was not banned from bidding for US public sector projects.
In a non-Ponzian case like Siemens, If the whole intricate web of bribery is not externally detected and exposed, it can continue unabated for a very long time, without putting the whole company in jeopardy. This is why the Siemens' type of corporate bribery requires particular mechanisms of external monitoring and oversight, plus serious whistleblower protection. Once corruption is detected,very high financial penalties, and, at least as important, transparent disclosure of such sanctions and misdeeds, need to be applied.
All International organizations, such as the UN, EU, the World Bank, Regional Development Banks, as well as bilateral donor agencies, and, more broadly, all governments, need to have fully transparent sanction mechanisms in place. Firms found to have engaged in bribery should be debarred from contracts with such organizations or governments. Such debarment should be public. Such transparent disclosure is a major deterrent to such corrupt practices, as it significantly raises the (reputational) cost of engaging in such practices.
In such international organizations and governments that award contracts to such firms, full and detailed disclosure of the sanction and of the extent of the misdeed should be timely and not be limited to small companies or mere individuals. Mighty multinationals, regardless of how 'politically untouchable' they may have been in the past, ought not get special dispensation any longer from governments or international organization when they have been engaged in bribery.
Timely public debarment is not only important for non-Ponzian companies like Siemens, of course. Earlier public debarment of Satyam (their bribery was known for many years, even if it was only the tip of the Ponzian iceberg) would have lowered the cost to India's IT industry. Clearly, while Siemens and Satyam corruption scandals are very different, this recommendation applies to both cases.
Nonetheless, whether Ponzinomics applies or not to a particular corporate corruption case does have implications for the diagnosis, and for some of the practical implications and recommendations. More in future entries...
637 UNDP Staffers are Millionaires, and another 1041 UNDP staffers have enough salary (income) to justify million dollar homes in New York (or tri-state area NY/NJ/CT).
UN/UNDP's budgets are untransparent !
U.N. budget is “utterly opaque, untransparent and completely in the shadow” and would benefit from being consolidated and audited from the outside. MMB from NyTimes
JOSE RAMOS HORTA - PRESIDENT OF EAST TIMOR
‘‘You know how many layers of bureaucracy there are when the European Union wants to help East Timor? Well, they don’t provide the funds to us, the funds allocated are managed by world bank. And the world bank has its own layers of bureaucracy. And they charge for that. The project is then managed by UNDP. But UNDP is only good at doing studies, they don’t execute projects.’‘
Boutros Boutros-Ghali on UN:
"perhaps half of the UN work force does nothing useful"
Can Helen Clark be trusted on Climate Change ?
President Obama's answer to Helen Clark's appeal for US to do more on climate change was : "I think the American people right now have been so focused, and will continue to be focused, on our economy and jobs and growth that ... if the message is somehow, we're going to ignore jobs and growth simply to address climate change, I don't think anybody's gonna go for that," he said. "I won't go for that."
In 2011 Rami Makhlouf - a trusted development partner of UNDP in Syria
In 2008 U.S. Treasury designation: Rami Makhluf Designated for Benefiting from Syrian Corruption (Click on photo to see US Treasury page)
"Screwed" How Foreign Countries Are Ripping America Off
A full chapter (7) dedicated to UNDP and UN Secretariat. But it today at Amazon.com (click above picture)
Asma al-Assad is UNDP's champion of reform in Syria
UNDP's special relations with dictators and terror is well documented. Yet, they continue to operate covered by UN Immunity. Click on immage for story.
Aicha Gaddafi You are Fired !
UNDP continues to be in bed with other dictators. Will clean it one at a time.
Where is NETAID money David Morrison?
UNDP Transparency Censored
UNDP's moto is: - eliminate the uncomfortable, frighten those who disagree, "educate" the perplexed..
UNDP Chief Finance Officer
The UNDP is a secretive organization and so far has kept in the dark every information related to its Chief Finance Officer and Deputy Assistant Administrator, Mr. Darshak Shah. Click on the picture for more on Finance Office of UNDP.
UNDP Belarus - best breast corner
Should tax-payers dollars be used to photograph beautiful breasts - even when making a valid point?
Uncle Helen turning UNDP into a cove of corrupt NZ labour politicians
CLICK ON PICTURE TO SEE Chris Carter's latest Credit Card scandal - can he work at UNDP after that? It seems YES he is full tested!!
Helen Clark says: "No more cars"
Thinking about buying a new car this year? Why, you evil Westerner! You don’t need that. You are demanding your new car off the sweat, toil, and exploitation of the world’s poorest people in developing countries.
Eveline Herfkens belongs to Jail - she should return imemdiately Dutch Taxpayers money.
if anyone else would have done what Eveline Herfkens did, would have long been in jail. We denounce this impunity and demand justice.
Andrew Mitchell - says Helen Clark is up to no good!
1. UNDP’s partnership with the World Bank needs to be more effective, particularly in fragile and crisis-affected countries. 2. UNDP’s near universal mandate means its technical resources are spread very thinly. The Board does not provide strategic direction. HR management is weak. It has a weak results chain. 3. There is limited evidence of active senior management consideration of cost control. Country evidence points to mixed progress on demonstrating cost-efficiency. 4. The Executive Board is politicised and there is a lack of consensus on the key areas for reform. It is not clear that current plans for change will deliver the required depth and breadth of reform. 5. Evidence gathered at country level was highly critical of UNDP’s ability to deliver results. Its delivery can be undermined by staffing issues and bureaucratic processes. 6. Its performance in fragile states is mixed. It has reasonable training and a range of guidance and analytical tools but struggles to fill posts. 7. There is no evidence that the Climate Strategy was directly guiding resource allocation decisions
Mark Malloch Brown outraged over Aicha Gaddafi
“I hope she's not a UNDP Ambassador,” ...“I don't think it's UNDP. I was surprised when I saw that... she was an Ambassador to any part of the UN system.”
Travel Palestine - Rediscover Your Senses
Get ready to a sensual feast of ...sounds...scents of The Land of حماس Ḥamās Documentary sponsored by UNDP Funds (click on picture for video)
Helen Clark on UNDP's own corruption (Can she be trusted?)
“When funds intended for life-saving treatment and prevention are stolen, that theft is tantamount to murder.” CLICK ON PICTURE FOR MORE
Scandal in Rwanda with Human Development Report
Aurelien Agbenonci, UNDP's RR in Kigali accuses Khalid Malik of making up data without UNDP Rwanda's knowledge. Rwanda Government is unhappy !!!
H.E. Dirk Niebel - German Development Minister
"I take the accusations made in the media concerning corruption and breach of fiduciary duty at the Global Fund very seriously and I am sure that the Fund will clarify the matter without delay. Germany is one of the biggest donors to the Global Fund. I have therefore seen to it that a special review will be held. I have frozen all further disbursements to the Fund until matters have been fully clarified, and I will ask a representative of the Fund to come to the BMZ to discuss the matter."
US Amb. Joseph Torsella blows the whistle on UN budgets
U.N. Secretariat’s proposed $5.2 “regular” budget for 2012-2013, was “simply loosening our belt a little less than we originally planned.”
The U.N. Exposed
How the United Nations Sabotages America's Security and Fails the World (Click in picture to purchase the book)
Share now information about illegal dealings at United Nations
If you are in possession of UNDP or any other United Nations Agency' contracts, correspondence, financial records or databases, which you believe detail wrongdoing such as fraud, mismanagement and abuse of authority, and you have failed to have UN's internal control, oversight and justice systems respond and/or react to your claims, you can send them to UNDP-WATCH and we will make them public keeping your identity anonymous and confidential.
Send an email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Helen Clark is watching you!
Gaddafi aint got nothing on UNDP - Click on the picture for more!
Malakia: A Turk advises Greece on Economy
Kemal Dervis (Turkish) and George Papandreou (Greek) share many late-night phone calls together (Click on picture to read story)
Where does Ban stand on Libya?
C'est vraiment ce que tu veux pour ta carriere?
United Nations Dispute Tribunal finds Ethics Office decisions Appealable
Because UNDT is the first level of the UN’s two-tiered justice system, there is a possibility that this decision may be appealed. Hopefully, the Secretary-General will not be “absurd” enough to do so. Click above to go to GAP page.
Andrew Mitchell Demands Transparency from United Nations
And I promise you as well that in future, when it comes to international development, we will want to see hard evidence of the impact your money makes. Not just dense and impenetrable budget lines but clear evidence of real effect
YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT UNITED NATIONS
Ban Ki Moon supports Ethics Decision on UNDP North Korea
Question: He recommends strongly that UNDP pays 14 months back pay to the whistleblower. Does the Secretary-General stand behind that recommendation? Should UNDP in fact pay that money, or are they free to rebuff that recommendation? Spokesperson: We will see what is going to happen. The Secretary-General of course is behind Mr. Benson on his report. There is no doubt about it. What UNDP will do, we will be seeing this; how they will implement that report.
UNDP Watch is a grouping of United Nations Staff committed to openness. We believe that everyone has the right to access information held by United Nations.
Despite a stated commitment to openness, UNDP remain a highly secretive agency.
Although a wealth of information is available on some UNDP websites, its Executive Board operate behind closed doors, much important programme and administrative information is never made available and, as a rule, information that is disclosed is provided only after relevant decisions have effectively been taken.
While UNDP has adopted “internal policies” on information disclosure, they in fact operate on precisely the opposite presumption. For the most part, they list which documents will be disclosed and when, and there is a presumption against the disclosure of all the other information they hold. They do not establish right of access, the lists of documents subject to disclosure is limited, they do not set out clear and narrow grounds for refusing access and they do not provide for independent oversight mechanisms to ensure proper implementation of the policy.
The UNDP WATCH is calling for the complete overhaul of these policies.
"...We believe that without accountability, there is impunity. We ask that you (Secretary General) not be complicit in cover-up of what happened prior to 11 Dec attack. The staff is sick and tired of the impunity extended by the office of the Secretary-General to senior managers for their failings especially in situations where it has led to death and disability."