UNDP WATCH: RFP for the provision of a Knowledge Management Platform for Climate Risk Management in Central Asia

Monday, February 21, 2011

RFP for the provision of a Knowledge Management Platform for Climate Risk Management in Central Asia – Phase 1.

Tender: 2011-0419RFP (CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS TENDER ON UNDP SITE)

Submission deadline: 28 February 2011
Procurement method: Request for Proposal
Category: Services
Tender details:

Request for Proposal (RFP)

Date: 17 January, 2011

Dear Sir/Madam,

Subject: RFP for the provision of a Knowledge Management Platform for Climate Risk Management in Central Asia – Phase 1.

You are requested to submit a proposal for IT services, as per enclosed Terms of Reference (TOR).

To enable you to submit a proposal, attached are:

Instructions to Offerors (Annex I)
General Conditions of Contract(Annex II)
Terms of Reference (TOR) (Annex III)
Proposal Submission Form (Annex IV)
Price Schedule (Annex V)

Your offer comprising of technical proposal and financial proposal, in separate sealed envelopes, should reach the following address no later than 18 February 2011, 5 pm CET.

THE SUBMISSION DEADLINE WAS EXTENDED UNTIL FEBRUARY 28, 2011, 16:00 CET.

UNDP Bratislava Centre

Grosslingova 35, 811 09 Bratislava, Slovakia

Attention: Miroslav Hrenovcik, Registry

Tel: 00421 2 59337 111

Fax: 00421 2 59337 450

If you request additional information, we would endeavour to provide information expeditiously, but any delay in providing such information will not be considered a reason for extending the submission date of your proposal. Contact email address in case of queries:milka.bindasova@undp.org

You are requested to acknowledge receipt of this letter and to indicate whether or not you intend to submit a proposal.

Yours sincerely,

Andrey Pogrebnyak

Assistant Director (Operations)

FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS/ UPDATES PLEASE CHECK OUR WEBSITE ON REGULAR BASIS.

Vendor: [ not identified ]
Contract value: [ not identified ]
Award date: [ not identified ]
Attachments:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Andrew Mitchell - says Helen Clark is up to no good!

1. UNDP’s partnership with the World Bank needs to be more effective, particularly in fragile and crisis-affected countries. 2. UNDP’s near universal mandate means its technical resources are spread very thinly. The Board does not provide strategic direction. HR management is weak. It has a weak results chain. 3. There is limited evidence of active senior management consideration of cost control. Country evidence points to mixed progress on demonstrating cost-efficiency. 4. The Executive Board is politicised and there is a lack of consensus on the key areas for reform. It is not clear that current plans for change will deliver the required depth and breadth of reform. 5. Evidence gathered at country level was highly critical of UNDP’s ability to deliver results. Its delivery can be undermined by staffing issues and bureaucratic processes. 6. Its performance in fragile states is mixed. It has reasonable training and a range of guidance and analytical tools but struggles to fill posts. 7. There is no evidence that the Climate Strategy was directly guiding resource allocation decisions

H.E. Dirk Niebel - German Development Minister

"I take the accusations made in the media concerning corruption and breach of fiduciary duty at the Global Fund very seriously and I am sure that the Fund will clarify the matter without delay. Germany is one of the biggest donors to the Global Fund. I have therefore seen to it that a special review will be held. I have frozen all further disbursements to the Fund until matters have been fully clarified, and I will ask a representative of the Fund to come to the BMZ to discuss the matter."

Share now information about illegal dealings at United Nations

Ban Ki Moon supports Ethics Decision on UNDP North Korea