UNDP WATCH: UN's Administrative costs of managing donors money skyrocket to 13%

Saturday, April 4, 2009

UN's Administrative costs of managing donors money skyrocket to 13%

Yes the United Nations is charging donors for managing their contributions for the world poorest a swapping 13%.

For every dollar that world tax-payers contribute towards foreign/external aid, United Nations will get 13 cents for its bureaucratic, corrupt and criminal machinery.

While the world leaders call for more REGULATIONS in Finance system, they forgetting that the only way to assist the poor countries is to provide direct contribution to them in a form of loans either thru IMF or World Bank. Channeling funds thru United Nations or its agencies not only will not help the poor, but will worsen their situation since the money for sure will only make it to the local government cronies or UN corrupt machinery.

SAY STOP TO THE UNITED NATIONS

CALL YOUR MP AND SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

No comments:

Post a Comment

Andrew Mitchell - says Helen Clark is up to no good!

1. UNDP’s partnership with the World Bank needs to be more effective, particularly in fragile and crisis-affected countries. 2. UNDP’s near universal mandate means its technical resources are spread very thinly. The Board does not provide strategic direction. HR management is weak. It has a weak results chain. 3. There is limited evidence of active senior management consideration of cost control. Country evidence points to mixed progress on demonstrating cost-efficiency. 4. The Executive Board is politicised and there is a lack of consensus on the key areas for reform. It is not clear that current plans for change will deliver the required depth and breadth of reform. 5. Evidence gathered at country level was highly critical of UNDP’s ability to deliver results. Its delivery can be undermined by staffing issues and bureaucratic processes. 6. Its performance in fragile states is mixed. It has reasonable training and a range of guidance and analytical tools but struggles to fill posts. 7. There is no evidence that the Climate Strategy was directly guiding resource allocation decisions

H.E. Dirk Niebel - German Development Minister

"I take the accusations made in the media concerning corruption and breach of fiduciary duty at the Global Fund very seriously and I am sure that the Fund will clarify the matter without delay. Germany is one of the biggest donors to the Global Fund. I have therefore seen to it that a special review will be held. I have frozen all further disbursements to the Fund until matters have been fully clarified, and I will ask a representative of the Fund to come to the BMZ to discuss the matter."

Share now information about illegal dealings at United Nations

Ban Ki Moon supports Ethics Decision on UNDP North Korea