Showing posts with label aicha gadhafi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aicha gadhafi. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

UNDP's goodwill ambassadors collage in Flickr misses Aicha Gadhafi pics

United Nations Development Programme's buddy icon UNDP Goodwill Ambassadors

Ambassadors share human development concern and commitment

They are at the top of their field, whether it's broadcasting, the literary world or the football stadium, with talents and achievements that have made them household names in their own, and in some cases, in many other countries. Despite their diverse claims to fame, however, they all share a deep concern for the world's poor and a commitment to making the planet a better place for all, ridding it of poverty, combating HIV/AIDS, ensuring environmental sustainability, protecting human rights, and empowering women.

For more information: www.undp.org/goodwill/

CLICK HERE FOR FLICKR PHOTOS 

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Father of UNDP's Goodwill Ambassador for Libya Killed !


Muammar Gaddafi the father of United Nations Development Programme's Goodwill Ambassador for Libya was killed.

There is no official reaction so far from Helen Clark nor Ban Ki -moon but we are certain that they will send their condolences to Amb. Aicha Gaddafi (Ayesha Gaddafi).

Ayesha Gaddafi was appointed as the United Nations Development Program National ‎Goodwill Ambassador for Libya on 24 July 2009, primarily to address the issues ofHIV/AIDS, poverty and women's rights in Libya, all of which are culturally sensitive topics in the country.[5][6] (click here for this on Wikipedia)

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

This is how Ban Ki Moon helps the environment - riding only 1/4 mile from his home to work in a 12 cylinder Mercedes-Benz @ $400,000

undpwatch
is "dedicated" 2 climate change -he drives his $400K 12 cylinder 2 work only 1/4mile away from
1 minute ago via web
undpwatch
is saving the environment by driving everyday 2 work (1/4 mile) in a 400,000 mercedes 12 cilinder - nice..;)

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

KoreaHerald: Model U.N. creates goodwill ambassadors to Korea

THIS WAS ONE OF THE LATEST U.N. GOODWILL AMBASSADORS

Aicha Gaddafi
Aicha Gaddafi You are Fired !


This year’s model U.N. conference, which took place in Incheon from Aug. 10-14, attracted a record number of participants from around the world, largely helped by the attendance of the United Nations chief.

About 1,000 high school, university and graduate students from 60 countries discussed pending global issues, ranging from global warming to a U.S.-led financial market crisis in Songdo, a district of the Incheon Free Economic Zone.

Their five days of impassioned discussion resulted in resolutions on four topics ― nuclear safety and security, world food security, global warming and sustainable development.
Participants of the Global Model U.N. Conference applaud during the opening ceremony of The Global Model United Nations Conference at Songdo, Incheon, on Aug. 11. (Kim Myung-sub/The Korea Herald)

Saturday, February 26, 2011

UN/UNDP Office in Libya still not reporting on what is happening on the ground. Praises Gaddafi and its development foundation!

While the United Nations Secretary-General has already "fired" Aicha Gaddafi as it Goodwill Ambassador for Libya, the UN and UNDP Office in Libya has still to report this fact in its website.

As you can see here, the UN/UNDP Libya website still praises the "fruitful relationship with Gaddafi's Government".




While on another page it still shows that Gaddafi Development Foundation is still UNDP's and United Nations Observer.



Thursday, February 24, 2011

Mark Malloch Brown outraged of UNDP's decision to nominate Aicha Gaddafi as its Goodwill Ambassador


I hope she's not a UNDP Ambassador,” ...“I don't think it's UNDP. I was surprised when I saw that... she was an Ambassador to any part of the UN system.”

It's Time To Intervene

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THIS ON SLATE.COM

What the international community can do to support regime change in Libya.

By Shadi Hamid

During an otherwise bizarre, incoherent speech on Tuesday, Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi clarified one thing: He is ready and willing to slaughter his own people if his survival requires it.

In confirming what many had already suspected, Libya has moved from one stage of conflict to another. The more appropriate model here is not Egypt or Tunisia but rather Bosnia, Kosovo, or Iraq after the first Gulf War—civil conflicts in which leaders perpetrated premeditated, mass killing of noncombatants.

Only a few days after pro-democracy protests first broke out, the death toll has risen as high as 1,000, according to some estimates. It is likely to get worse, threatening a repeat of Syrian President Hafez Assad's destruction of Hama in 1982, which claimed at least 10,000 lives. To prevent a similar outcome, the international community—specifically the United States, the United Nations, and NATO—must intervene.

The international response to the Libyan crisis has so far been lacking in both vision and resolve. Initial reactions, with their by now tiresome phrasing—"expressing grave concern" and "urging restraint"—suggested a limited vocabulary that was not commensurate with the gravity of the crimes being committed. Washington has threatened to consider "all appropriate action," but Western officials have been slow to specify what that might be. In its place is a general sense that the United States and its allies have limited leverage.

We are, however, well beyond leverage. Qaddafi and his family do not seem in the mood for negotiation or compromise. Their promise to fight to the "last drop of blood" has said as much. The objective, then, is not to pressure Qaddafi and his sons but to support pro-democracy forces and encourage regime defections to the opposition. The goal is no longer change but regime change.

Regime defections will mount if the momentum continues to shift. Already, the government is losing control over its territory, with Benghazi, the country's second-largest city, falling to anti-Qaddafi forces. That momentum will build if Libyans see that the international community is not only watching but acting.

What can be done? This is a time for bold, creative policy-making. For starters, NATO should quickly move to enforce a no-fly zone over Libya, both to send a strong message to the regime and to prevent the use of helicopters and planes to bomb and strafe civilians. The United States and European allies should freeze the assets of senior Libyan officials and consider other targeted sanctions. Meanwhile, the international community should also let it be known that any individuals involved in perpetrating atrocities will be prosecuted before the International Criminal Court, while regime figures who defect to the opposition will be granted amnesty.

If the conflict threatens to spill over into outright civil war, and the death toll reaches into the tens of thousands, the United Nations will need to consider more advanced measures, including authorizing the deployment of peacekeeping troops to protect civilian populations in the eastern part of the country.

At such a critical moment, it is unfortunate that the Bush administration's destructive adventurism in Iraq tainted the notion of humanitarian intervention. Understandably, the world is wary of aggressive Western interference in the affairs of other states. Libya, in this respect, provides a critical test for the effectiveness of the United Nations, norms of humanitarian protection, and international law more generally.

Under Chapter VII of the U.N. charter, the organization has a mandate to intervene, as appropriate, to respond to "any threat of the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression." Invoking Chapter VII would be a good first step to advance the debate about appropriate policy tools and to internationalize the mode of response, in accordance with international legal conventions.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

FOXNEWS: Aicha Gaddafi is no longer a U.N.D.P. Goodwill Ambassadors - U.N. agency cut its ties with the dictators family

Fox News - Fair & Balanced


The United Nations is Cutting Ties With Libya's Ruling Family

By George Russell

Published February 23, 2011

| FoxNews.com

As the body count rises from the brutal repression of revolt in Libya, the United Nations is abruptly cutting some of its intimate ties with members of the ruling family of despot Muammar al-Qaddafi.

In response to a question from Fox News, a spokesman for the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the U.N.’s flagship anti-poverty agency, revealed that his organization had just terminated the appointment of Qaddafi’s daughter Aisha as a National UNDP Goodwill Ambassador For Libya, “following the recent events.”

The “recent events” was a reference to the increasingly bloody repression of revolt in Libya, where anywhere from 200 to 1,000 dissidents have reportedly been killed, and where Aisha Qaddafi’s brother, Saif al-Islam Qaddafi, has declared that he will fight “to the last bullet” to preserve his father’s regime.

The separation between Aisha Qaddafi and UNDP was no doubt painful for both sides. Ms Qaddafi is Secretary General of a Libyan welfare organization called the Waatasemu Charity Association, and her goodwill ambassadorship, announced in July 2009, was part of an effort to raise HIV/AIDS awareness and the issue of violence toward women, both sensitive topics in Libya.

Ms Qaddafi’s charity was also generous to UNDP in other ways, donating $1.5 million for construction of a co-educational elementary school for Palestinian children in Gaza, which was slated to begin construction in January.

UNDP’s spokesman justified the separation by citing a U.N. Guideline governing the appointment of Goodwill Ambassadors or Messengers of Peace, calling for termination of the relationship “if the Messenger of Peace or Goodwill Ambassador engages in any activity incompatible with his/her status or with the purposes and principles of the United Nations, or if the termination is in the interest of the Organization.”

UNDP was also hastily creating a similar distance between itself and Aisha’s brother Saif, whose own charitable vehicle, the Qaddafi Charity and Development Foundation (GICDF), was granted official observer status as a non-governmental organization (NGO) by the U.N. in January 2009.

The UNDP announcement of that status cited a “long and healthy partnership” between the Qaddafi foundation and the U.N., which included “numerous successful projects.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL ANNOUNCEMENT

The effusive 2009 UNDP announcement came at a time when Saif Qaddafi was being lionized, especially in Europe, as a reformer who would modernize and perhaps abate the stultifying Qaddafi dictatorship as his father faded from the scene.

But by this week, the enthusiasm was greatly muted. The sole “successful project” cited by UNDP in response to questions from Fox News about the touted partnership was a project to eliminate land mines in Libya, carried out by the Libyan De-mining Society, an NGO that operates “under the supervision of GICDF” but is ostensibly separate from it.

That project, started in 2009, involved UNDP creation of a mine removal manual emphasizing a “humanitarian approach” to the activity, provision of a “mine action management course” for “a wide variety of stakeholders” and the passing on of an undefined “gender guideline” to local mine removal staff, and cost $255,000. It ended in 2010, according to the spokesman.

The UNDP official made no mention of other programs involving the U.N. agency and Saif Qaddafi’s charity, some of which were referenced in the original UNDP press release bestowing special status on GICDF. These included additional HIV/AIDS awareness work, and a plan to increase Libyan community involvement in environmental protection.

In addition, UNDP said at the time, “new opportunities for cooperation are being discussioned by U.N, UNDP and the Qaddafi Foundation, to further cement this partnership and take advantage of the new avenues of cooperation offered by the foundation’s official U.N. NGO status.”

Apparently not any longer. This week, in an apparent attempt to downplay the Qaddafi charity’s U.N. observer status, officials in the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), where NGO status is recorded, had added a badly spelled entry that underlined the fact that the charity did not have the additional distinction of “consultative” status, meaning the right to address official meetings.

CLICK HERE FOR THE ECOSOC ANNOUNCEMENT

But whether consultative in status or not, the Qaddafi charity was apparently still talking a language the U.N. is hardly ever unhappy to hear: the ringing tones of cash.

A statement on the Gaddafi charity website announced that the organization six months ago signed a $50 million deal with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNWRA, to build 1,250 new homes in Gaza as replacements for those it claims were destroyed by Israel

It remains to be seen whether Libya’s largesse will have any effect on deliberations of the United Nations Human Rights Council, where the European Union is pressing for an investigation of “extremely grave human rights violations” in connection with the repression of protesters during the upheaval.

Libya itself is a member of the council, until 2013. Among the nations also serving as members of the 48-nation Council are such jittery Arab states as Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia—and such other despotisms as Cuba and China.

George Russell is executive editor of Fox News

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

While UNDP keeps Aicha Gaddafi as its Goodwill Ambassador - Saif Al Gaddafi suspended from the Forum of Young Global Leaders


Saif Al GaddafiFollowing the recent developments in Libya the Forum of Young Global Leaders has taken the following decision.

Saif Al Gaddafi was appointed as a Young Global Leader at a time when it appeared that he represented the potential for a future Libyan government that was more progressive, more concerned for human rights and more open to the possibilities of political reform.

When there were doubts about his position, earlier this year, we decided not to act or to suspend his membership in view of the very difficult Swiss-Libyan relations during the last two years, to which we did not want to give further cause for deterioration.

After the events of the last days in Libya and his direct intervention, it is clear that potential has not been fulfilled and that it is impossible for him to continue as a member of our community.

We are therefore suspending his membership in the YGL Community with immediate effect.

The Forum of Young Global Leaders will continue to make the tough calls on the future of leadership - both in the selection phase or in suspension of membership - to protect the integrity of this values-driven community.

David Aikman

Head of the Forum of Young Global Leaders